Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sommovigo who wrote (5704)	8/17/2000 7:18:03 PM
From: peter_moreno	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19428

I know trying to argue with you and little Timmy is a lost cause but lets try again. When Elgindy, for instance, tells his posse via telephone, fax, or IM to short a stock and they act within moments (as quoted in the Wired article of April, 2000), and this information is not made public - that could be considered to be CONSPIRING (as it involves more than one person, and it is privately done) and since he has 250 members acting "within moments" to short a stock, it falls under Section 9 as someone selling with knowledge of others selling at substantially the same price at substantially the same time. Do these people tell people to go forth and short or do these people merely state what they are doing and others make up their own minds? Peter