Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (5722)	8/17/2000 12:27:58 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

why dont you give the guy a break...you short sellers go short then attack the stock until you beat it to death in a market where everyone is on pins and needles..then you move on to the next one...like i said i dont give a rats ass if you short a stock..go short a million shres of exds for all i care...but you start posting false and misleading information you will have me as your worst nightmare... this post is in general and not at one person

To: Mama Bear who wrote (5722)	8/17/2000 12:34:17 PM
From: sommovigo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

Barb, Please, you're being coy and you're assuming that I don't have much intelligence. That assumption will put you at a distinct disadvantage, so reconsider your opinion. You have banned me from posting to the A@P thread - fine by me. Sounds like you want to silence the voices of dissention so that only yours can be heard. Fine by me. My voice is being heard at levels that matter much more deeply than your board - you have succeeded in making a public message board private, at least when it comes to my posting to it. However, you have yet to offer a single intelligent defense - at best you offer ridicule, perhaps some feign pity, but nothing objective to counter what I have had to say. In the meantime, I am becoming even more intimately familiar with SEC laws and becoming even more familiar with the evidence that I am gathering, as penned (typed) by the very people who I suspect of being guilty of fraud. And this is no small matter, so I urge you to take it seriously. No amount of insult, feign pity, or coyness on your part changes one iota of the evidence, nor does it change the letter of the law in any respect. I would suggest you spending less time criticizing me and more time examining what part, if any, you may have played into what seems to be a conspired scheme to defraud retail investors. Examine closely, as Elgindy and/or Auric may not have advised you of the potential risk you were possibly taking while contemporaneously shorting with them. It is already assumed that Auric didn't even advise you that he was a registered broker working for an SEC registered securities dealer, nor did he advise you of any potential conflicts of interest he may have had because of that. I will tell you this much, I suspect that in order to save their skins they will throw lemmings like you under the bus faster than a fart in an elevator offends the senses... I would also suggest that you spend a little time with an securities law-firm attorney and discuss any possible exposure you may have as a result of possibly being duped by your favorite gurus into possibly comitting a crime.