SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mani1 who wrote (5421)8/17/2000 4:17:44 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Dear Mani:

Re: 1500 Tbird

Well, if AMD pulls an Intel stunt, it would use the Merced HSF and surround the chip with TFE too.

Pete



To: Mani1 who wrote (5421)8/17/2000 4:20:04 PM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
<..and coppermine has significantly less power.>
This is incorrect and misleading, do not repeat
paul's propaganda.

AMD publishes highest possible
power consumption numbers for the worst case -
90C case, special worst-case CPU execising software.
None of the known applications get even close to
80% of the specified power parameters even for a
millisecond. It is done to ensure solid board
design.

Intel instead publishes a joker's spec, where they
contradict themselves - when max power is just
about the same as "typical" power. There is a
couple of amateur's software ("BURNP6" and BURNBX")
by Robert Redelmeier ( redelm@ev1.net ). It can
run CPU at 40% higher power than it gets on the
heaviest SPEC-95 FPU calculations (which are among
the heaviest power consumers). There were numerous
reports of Coppermine overheating during continuous
game play on Usenet groups. Just take a look a recent
message about HP machines with side blower. Also look
at recent development of all-copper-made heat sinks
exclusively for coppermines and willamettes,
reported on some Japanese web site few month ago.

Regards,
- Ali