Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (5502)	8/17/2000 9:45:24 PM
From: muzosi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

re: By your definition then, lets say I was managment and you came to me for a job. You had a Doctors degrees from Mit. I hired you to do a job. If I found out later that you falsified your Mit degrees, and had royally botched the job because you actually was an idiot, it would be my fault that you are an idiot because I was the manager? Makes sense to me Yes, that would be true because "If I found out later that you falsified your Mit degrees" you didn't verify the qualifications fully. It is your responsibility as a manager to hire qualified people. If someone managed to lie to you, it is your fault. Muzo

To: hmaly who wrote (5502)	8/17/2000 10:19:52 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

<..it would be my fault that you are an idiot because I was the manager?> Perfect example! Of course the fault is yours, whose else? Even if an employee appears to be a crook, it was your project and you were in charge and control to hire right people for the job. Clear like a sunny day. <You probably thought that dissing a stock raised the price.> You seem to think that talking hype on a SI thread is the primary reason for stock to move. BTW, I couldn't find the term "dissing" in my dictionary... Is this the same root as "dissident"? Interesting.