SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (5523)8/18/2000 12:59:00 AM
From: hmalyRespond to of 275872
 
Ali....Re<<<<"That just goes to prove the old saying, << Never get into an argument with a complete fool, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.<<<<"
I did not realize that you have so low opinion of
yourself.<<<<<<


Well, I have been called that, so why not. Besides, it is just a Tag like crazyoldman. You don't think Crazyoldman is really crazy do you? ....AH AH my mistake. Forget I asked the question.

That saying by the way comes from a Dilbert book. One of the guys on the Tom's hardware thread signed his posts with that. I think it is always good for a laugh.



To: Ali Chen who wrote (5523)8/18/2000 2:04:20 AM
From: BilowRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Hi Ali Chen; Thanks for the posts on the power consumption of AMD and Intel processors, I was unaware that the power consumption figures were so close (i.e. 30%). That makes it pretty easy to figure out the respective difficulties in the cooling requirements:

AMD Intel
Tj 90 62 (Degrees C)
Tamb 24 24 (i.e. 75 degrees F)
-- --
Tdiff 66 38

Power 65 50 (Watts, my guess here, but ratio is 30%.)
TR 1.01 .76 (Thermal resistance of heat sink.)


In other words, the Intel machines require 25% better heat sinks. To get back to heat sink parity (and therefore, in some way, overclocking equality), Intel needs to get their Tj back to around 75 degrees C.)

-- Carl