Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (15803)	8/18/2000 12:14:09 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Respond to of 21876

It is up to each of us to do our own DD. I found Mr. Fun's comments to be thought provoking. I did not buy any LU. Nor did I sell any NT because my own reading led me to believe that NT had a better 10 Gbps product. I still believe that and will not change my opinion until I see the sales figures that prove otherwise. LU is probably undervalued at this point. However, the market hates uncertainty and LU's future appears very uncertain.

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (15803)	8/18/2000 12:37:33 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

I have. But I don't go around claiming that my "contacts" within a particular company are saying optimistic things while I'm secretly selling the stock.

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (15803)	8/18/2000 2:29:17 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21876

Here, Jim. Why don't you be judge as to whether Mr. Fun pumped and dumped. July 14, 2000: Mr. Fun: "Personally, my contacts say this quarter looks terrific... If the bull case is right, LU will challenge its all time high, and soon - can you say $85? I would not be selling now..."* Message 14050935 July 20, 2000: LU reports earnings, stock dives. July 26, 2000: Mr. Fun: *"Reduced LU a little starting a couple days before earnings..."* Message 14111960