SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RocketMan who wrote (29502)8/19/2000 12:08:08 AM
From: dwayanu  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 35685
 
Hi RocketMan:

..a no-brainer with downside protection, which as V says is the best reason for CCs.

McMillian, Options as a Strategic Investment, "Covered call writing is the name given to the strategy by which one sells a call option while simultaneously owning the obligated number of shares of underlying stock. The writer should be mildly bullish, or at least neutral, toward the underlying stock. By writing a call option against stock, one always decreases the risk of owning the stock. It may even be possible to profit from a covered write if the stock declines somewhat. However, the covered call writer does limit his profit potential and therefore may not fully participate in a strong upward move in the price of the underlying stock. .... The strategy of owning the stock and writing the call will outperform outright stock ownership if the stock falls, remains the same, or even rises slightly. In fact, the only time that the outright owner of the stock will outperform a covered writer is if the stock increases in price by a relatively substantial amount during the life of the call. Moreover, if one consistently writes call options against his stock, his portfolio will show less variability of results from quarter to quarter."

Should be noted, in McMillian's world, stock volatility is low, option premiums are low, and commissions are high enough to overcome the premium benefit of an active buyback and rewrite strategy.

Also should be noted, 'outperform outright stock ownership' simply means doing better than the next guy, not necessarily making a profit in any given time period.

However, as clapton and others pointed out, if the vehicle keeps dropping, you have to uncover and rewrite to stay ahead of the game.

Doesn't have to be that way I think. Since we all have chosen high quality stocks <g> to write against, that we know will come back from a correction, then we can set a target say 30 or 40% under the stock's high, cover, buyback and rewrite every 10% or so of drop, and when the stock reaches that target, let the last written calls expire worthless, let the stock bottom and start back up (a few weeks, a couple of months), and then start writing again. Large success would involve investing some of the option premiums received into buying more of the stock at the lower prices.

Assumes of course that we are not dependent on getting the option premium each and every month for living expenses.

But, 2-3% per month is not bad.

Well, if I was going to take that kind of return, I would just buy QQQ, shove it in a vault, and go move to Australia. I'll come back in 2008 or 2009 to sell the QQQ and buy bonds before the post-Boomer ten-year bear market.

Personal opinion: In my mind, 'high quality stocks', with a good balance of high option premium and low long term risk, would be for example NTAP, SEBL, or EXDS, with CREE or ELON being too volatile and risky for the extra percent or two of premium. OTOH, my broker thinks my stock picks are too volatile and risky. You pays your nickle, you takes your choice. <g>

- Dwayanu