SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Meet Gene, a NASDAQ Market Maker -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gene_the_mm who wrote (638)8/19/2000 12:02:05 AM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1426
 
But let's say it's applied across the board. That's what the MMManip people want, right? That their shitty little penny stocks be treated just like DELL or MSFT.

Okay. So you've got this....THING...that normally trades about 20K shares a day, price about, oh, seventy five cents. And someone wants to sell 100K shares with a cap at two bucks...

Just imagine. It'd go screaming up, and then as it approached the cap the daytraders would sell, and it'd go screaming down. All in a matter of minutes. Well, good for those with VERY fast execution, but not for anyone else, I don't think. Unless things got out of hand, thanks to the Morons. I can envisage several scenarios... all too horrible to contemplate.

Have you been following the BIFS story?



To: gene_the_mm who wrote (638)8/19/2000 10:18:36 AM
From: dannobee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1426
 
Gene, if the SuperSOES goes through, and the max shares are <100,000, wouldn't more institutions just start using Barra/ITG POSIT instead of using the MM's on the large orders? It would seem to me that they could get better fills with more stable pricing with POSIT than the unpredictable whipsaws on the thinly traded issues. Or am I missing something here?