SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (107738)8/20/2000 12:13:55 AM
From: Dan3  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: So - which one did you buy?

I always spec a speed grade below the top - but since the 1.1 showed up and the 1.0 dropped in price, I've written req's for 2 servers with 1GHZ processors to a local VAR.

They are identical except for the controllers:

Asus A7V Motherboard

1.0 GHZ Thunderbird

512 Meg SDRAM

Adaptec 39160 (on one)

DPT 1564U3-2U3 (on the other - actually the replacement for this card. The part isn't formally released yet, but what they're shipping is now called the 2100S (number from memory) - it replaces a buslogic controller chip with an adaptec chip)

IBM Ultrastar 36LP drives (5) - they only run 7200RPM but are the only 36 gig ultra160 drive in a 1" form factor. They run a lot cooler than half-height, 10,000 rpm drives.

Chenbro Ultra cases with redundant power supplies.

We don't have them yet, I would guess about two weeks - the cases are the hardest part to get.

Both will run Windows 2000 server, one will run Oracle Enterprise 8.06, the other SQL Server 7, IIS, and Cold Fusion server.

A pentium system would certainly be more expensive and, in my opinion, less reliable. Although the Chenbro case would stand a good chance of keeping even an Intel CPU within its temperature specs, why not use the chip that's so much more robust? (1GHZ Thunderbird, OK to 90 degrees, 1GHZ Pentium, OK to 70 degrees. I sleep better knowing I have the margin)

Dan