SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/19/2000 7:59:51 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10354
 
Yes. Francois, so nice of Mr. Tobin to negotiate with the Boiler Rooms on George's behalf.

Real decent human being that Tobin. But it was easy for Mr. Tobin since 24% of Ziasuns earnings came from these Boiler Rooms that ripped people off and stole their money. I have another word for it. Its called ORGANIZED CRIME.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 12:54:19 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
Francois, is or is this not Tom Haysek the fraudulent Ray Dirks analyst that wrote the Strong Buy report on Ziasun?

By: Zsunshine $$$
Reply To: 25276 by meatloaf2 $$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:45 PM EDT
Post # of 25292


Yet another fraudulent POS promoter tied to ZIASUN

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST GREAT WHITE MARINE & RECREATION, INC. SEEKING TO REVOKE THE REGISTRATION OF ITS COMMON STOCK sec.gov

TIME FOR COME MEATLOAF/A/K/A Tom HeysekA/K/A Ray Dirks Analyst To COME CLEAN !IVE GOT SOAP

The date of this press release is dated July 22. 1999. Your post says you were at GREAT WHITE MARINE & RECREATION on July 23 1999. Time to stop conning unsuspecting investors with your trash talk!! Facts dont lie!!

"Then, one day, I decided to "drop" in in JAWS headquraters in Waco, Texas. That day was July 23, 1999...a Thursday as I recall."

"And finally, isn't this supposed to be a New Tel Message Board. If not, then let me remind you that there was NeoPharm (NEO)last April at $10, Sonic Foundry (SFO) last July at $8, and ZiaSun (ZSUN) last November at $7."

Title: GREAT WHITE MARINE & RECREATION, INC. ANNOUNCES THE APPOINTMENT OF RAY DIRKS AS FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Summary: WACO, Texas, Jul 22, 1999 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Colin Smith, President and CEO of Great White Marine and Recreation, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: JAWS), is pleased to announce the appointment of Ray Dirks as Financial Advisor to the company. library.northernlight.com

Tom Heysek

Initiating Research Coverage: Strong Buy Great White Marine & Recreation (OTC BB: JAWS) March 18, 1999
Contact: Tom Heysek @ 212-339-2035
Recent Price: $2.25
52 Week High-Low: 4.50 - 0.71
Shares Outstg: 17.9 million (fully diluted) Insiders Own: 55%
Market Cap: $40.3 million Institutions Own: 21%
Net Income Book Market Cap To:
Sales Amt Mgn EPS* P/E Value* Sales BVPS
(mm) (mm) (PS)
1997 $14.3 $1.7 12% $0.29 8 x $0.33 3 x 7 x
1998 25.6 3.3 13% 0.26 9 x 0.51 2 x 4 x
1999 (e) 40.0 5.5 14% 0.30 8 x 0.82 1 x 3 x
2000 (e) 60.0 9.0 15% 0.50 5 x 1.32

stockhouse.com

From Ragingbull:

By: meatloaf
Reply To: 2503 by sailbad43 Saturday, 4 Mar 2000 at 1:24 AM EST
Post # of 4572

Reply to sailbad43: I read with interest your posting #2503. Permit me to lead off with some relavant facts, which I bring to your attention due to the sense of regulatory-finesse that seems to pervade throughout your message.

At the moment, industry observers estimate that 35% of all trading is done online by individuals. These are generally with discount brokers who...unbeknownst to most of the investing public...obtained unqualified exemptions to meeting suitability requirements the regulators otherwise impose upon full-service brokers.

In addition, the fourth market (ECN's) represent another 30% of trading volume...also beyond technical regulatory purview.

Putting on my analyst's hat, what do these facts tell us. They tell us that the universe of what the regulators used to get involved with has shrunk by about two-thirds. So you have thousands of regulatory "pipple" looking for stuff to do. Hint: Think overstaffing, Sailbad.

I can only assume that your reference to employment opportunities means that you must be graduating this summer...so permit me to assist in your job search by guiding you to the fact that the FBI and various State's Attorney's General Offices are furtile ground to recent graduates. Let me know how you make out.

Now onto your message. Sometime in March of last year, the meatloaf crowd was quite keen on JAWS. Bought alot of stock around $2. The bloody company emerged as some sort of cult...never saw anything like it, except at a "Trekkie" convention my third wife lampooned me into.

Then, one day, I decided to "drop" in in JAWS headquraters in Waco, Texas. That day was July 23, 1999...a Thursday as I recall.

The Chairman of JAWS wasn't in, however, his son was. I attended that meeting with another independent analyst. After the requisite 45 minits of Texas horse-feathers, I asked this kid to see a copy of the company's last bank statement (JAWS was supposed to have $6 mil in ##' bank at the time).

One hour goes by (calling his Dad, I suspect). He says here's the March Statement...but nothing more current. We ask for April or May...nothing. Basically, we conclude, the Company is broke.

That's when the stock was at $2.50. Anybody that was part of that cult bailed out...and why in the world you would still be owning that stock at 10 cents is a mystery.

As to the FUSA reference in your message, we actually first wrote that up at $4. By the way, earnings and sales came in at precisely our estimates...at a time when no one else was even making forecasts.

And finally, isn't this supposed to be a New Tel Message Board. If not, then let me remind you that there was NeoPharm (NEO)last April at $10, Sonic Foundry (SFO) last July at $8, and ZiaSun (ZSUN) last November at $7.

Regards,

meatloaf

ragingbull.altavista.com

By: meatloaf2 $$
Reply To: 25279 by Zsunshine $$$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:59 PM EDT
Post # of 25292


I did not want to embarrass you, janehead, however, the article byline may say July 22...but it was in the July 23rd edition of the WSJ. It came out the very day I was there. But don't take my word for it. Go the the WSJ archives to call up the July 23rd edition. There, you will find the article. Any one who wants to believe Z-shine cab ignore that challenge, in which case, you're entitled to the financial damage he has caused you (and perhaps even entitles you to sue him) if you recently sold your Ziasun shares at say, $2...and, well, you've clearly been damaged by Zsunshine's false and misleading statements, and I bet you could find a dozen lawyers to take your case on a contingency IF YOU RECENTLY SOLD YOUR ZIASUN SHARES BASED ON ANYTHING, ANYTHING AT ALL, THAT ZSUNSHINE SAID you here and resulted in causing you material financial damage.

Just a thought.

Z-shine...more, please.
ragingbull.altavista.com

By: meatloaf2 $$
Reply To: 25221 by xcit $$$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:34 PM EDT
Post # of 25292


The WSJ article was much ado about nothing. Almost feckless. It read like an article spliced together from about four years of research...and the writer had to find a way to use it. So a few foreigners got ripped. You think the SEC has this on a high priority amongs its work load?

With drudgery, I turned to the article's continuation on the inside. There are 30,000 lawsuits filed in the US every year. So here's an article about 3 of them.

Guess the WSJ had some space to fill.

ragingbull.altavista.com

By: meatloaf2 $$
Reply To: 25273 by frisky $$$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:44 PM EDT
Post # of 25292


OT: Maybe you've been living in a hole, pal, so let me remind you that OJ was found Not Guilty. Your list of grievances are nothing more than renderings of opinion, and ill-informed, grudgingly derived opinions at that.

Fortunately, it's cranks like you that lead the regulators to not bother. So, a tip-o-the-hat to you. Let me know if you want a few more email-regulator addresses to hassle. Glad ta' help ya'.

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 1:31:35 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
Jones, Jensen & Co. Make the Front Page
gamblingmagazine.com
Five-year pump and dump scheme reported in the Wall Street Journal

THE BIZARRE SAGA of JONES AND JENSEN REVISITED

A story about another company connected with Starnet auditors, Jones and Jensen that made the front page of the Wall Street Journal. Gambling Magazine's private investigator has uncovered more damaging material about a company known as E-Pawn.com, Inc.

Here's a quote:

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 42938 / June 14, 2000

"The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of E-Pawn because of questions that have been raised about the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, the identity of the persons in control of the operations and management of the company and because the recent market activity in E-Pawn securities may be the result of manipulative conduct or other illegal activity."

(http://www.sec.gov/enforce/tsusp/34-42938.htm)

HERE IS YET ANOTHER FRADULENT COMPANY ASSOCIATED WITH JONES AND JENSEN. E- PAWN.COM INC filed this 10KSB on 04/24/2000

"The Company had no disagreement with its auditors, Jones Jensen & Company LLC, relating to any matters concerning its accounting procedures or policy. The Company accepted the resignation of Jones Jensen & Company LLC, and on March 16, 2000, the Company engaged the firm of Feldman Sherb Horowitz & Co., P.C., Certified Public Accountants, of New York, New York and Boca Raton, Florida to serve as its auditor



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 42938 / June 14, 2000

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), of trading of the securities of E-Pawn.com, Inc. ("E-Pawn"), of Coral Springs, Florida at 9:30 a.m. on June 14, 2000, and terminating at 11:59 p.m., on June 27, 2000…

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by the company.

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to E-Pawn's securities until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, Robert Knuts, Senior Trial Counsel, in the Northeast Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission should be telephoned at 212-748-8192.



The complaint enabled the government to halt trading of Internet companies Wamex Holdings Inc., with an $184-million market capitalization, and E-Pawn.com Inc., which had a capitalization of $198 million. Wamex was expected to launch an unauthorized independent trading system on July 4. During a press conference to release the charges, the government got a chuckle when it showed a preview of a Wamex advertisement that said "Who's at risk, you."

Here's the full story:

120 charged in biggest securities fraud crackdown in US history

Story Filed: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:55 PM EST

New York--June 14--Members of the five largest organized crime families teamed up with seven brokerage firms to commit a micro-cap securities manipulation that defrauded investors out of about $50 million, federal prosecutors alleged Wednesday in what was described as the biggest securities fraud crackdown in U.S. history.

The U.S. Attorney's office criminally charged 120 people, of which the Securities and Exchange Commission sued 63, for engineering a nationwide scheme to manipulate public and privately held securities in an elaborate five-year pump and dump scheme.

According to the charges, defendants would control large blocks of securities they obtained for free or at very discounted prices and sell them to investors at artificially inflated prices.

At the heart of the scheme was allegedly DMN Capital Investments Inc.--which Manhattan U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White called "truly the investment bank to the crooked and the corrupt--using traditional "boiler room" tactics as well as the Internet to promote the securities. Stocks were touted on the World Wide Web as "dot.coms" to induce investors, according to the complaint.

The allegations against DMN, which was controlled by members of the Bonanno and Colombo crime families, were revealed in a ten-month undercover investigation in which "witnesses posed as willing participants in ongoing criminal schemes," and recorded th e actions at the bank.

DMN, which worked with New York's other top three crime families, allegedly offered its services to any deal "as long as it was illicit." The list of associates reads like "a virtual who's who of securities violators," according to White, including investment advisers, company executives, lawyers and accountants.

The scheme worked in a circle with DMN in the center. Organized crime members who controlled the "investment bank" infiltrated the brokerage firms which then artificially increased the prices of select securities that it sold to investors for profits that were returned to DMN and shared with the brokers.

SEC Enforcement Director Dick Walker said the case, "is a study of classic tools of stock manipulation plus new Internet tools" that earned defendants an estimated $18.5 million in illicit profits.

Walker said the complaint enabled the government to halt trading of Internet companies Wamex Holdings Inc., with an $184-million market capitalization, and E-Pawn.com Inc., which had a capitalization of $198 million. Wamex was expected to launch an unauthorized independent trading system on July 4. During a press conference to release the charges, the government got a chuckle when it showed a preview of a Wamex advertisement that said "who's at risk, you."

Of the 120 defendants charged, 21 were charged with participating in a corrupt enterprise or RICO, for allegedly engineering a scheme to manipulate eight publicly traded securities with the help of brokers, who were bribed to participate.

The enterprise controlled various New York City area brokerages where they "engaged in prearranged trades, paid secret bribes to corrupt stock brokers, and used 'no net sale' and other 'boiler room' tactics," to pump up the stock prices in time to sell at a considerable profit, according to the charges. Brokers who reneged on the deal were subject to strong-arm tactics such as beatings, threats or in one instance a solicitation of murder, the complaint alleged.

The enterprise was allegedly comprised of members of both the Bonanno and Colombo crime families who controlled crews of brokers at firms including, First Liberty Investment Group Inc, William Scott & Co and Bryn Mawr Investment Group.

A New York detective was also allegedly involved in scheme and used his position as Detective' Endowment Association treasurer to further the scheme. Those firms allegedly also included Atlantic General Financial Group and Meyers Pollock and Robbins, which has been charged in similar schemes alleging the mob's infiltration of Wall Street. Representatives of the firms either declined comment or were unavailable.

The eight securities were Spaceplex Amusement Centers International, Reclaim Inc, Beachport Entertainment Corp, International Nursing Services, Leasing Edge Corp, Globus International Resources Corp, Innovative Medical Services and Accessible Software.

Those same RICO defendants were also charged with manipulating the private placement of three securities, including one by Ranch*1 Inc., a chain of fast food restaurants. Ranch*1's top two executives were charged in scheme and are also allegedly members of the Colombo Crime family.

Defendants, if convicted, could face between five and 80 years.

Among those charged were a total of 57 stock brokers, both licensed and not, three broker recruiters, 12 stock promoters, 30 company insiders, two accountants, an attorney, investment advisor, hedge fund manager and 10 members of organized crime families. There were a total of 19 publicly and 16 private securities used in the alleged scheme involving all the defendants.

FBI Assistant director Barry Mawn said the "defendants were as diverse as the crimes they are charged with," which include securities and wire fraud, murder solicitations, wire fraud, pension fund fraud, extortion, money laundering, bribery, and witness tampering.

Although the crimes varied the organized crime families remained the same. "Whether it is the fish market or the stock market," Mawn said, "they bring along the traditional tools of the trades; violence and the threat of violence."



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 1:36:57 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
"In summary, ZSUN has no growing prospect. OIA's profitability is declining. The game is over. ZSUN is worth not more than $.24."

By: frisky $$$
Reply To: None Sunday, 20 Aug 2000 at 1:22 PM EDT
Post # of 25295


ZSUN lost $1,557,478 in the second quarter of 2,000. However, the shameless management covered the loss with the unrealized gain of $3,800,000 from the 1.9 million illiquid restricted-shares of AFSI. The loss was primary from the badwill amortization of $2.8 million. The badwill was from paying 9,820,152 shares and $6,000,000 to Scott Elder, Ross Jardine, David McCoy and Scott Harris on May 15, 2000.

In its press release on August 11, ZSUN did not say how much it lost in the second quarter. Instead, iZSUN bragged a record six-month of EBITDA of $.39 per share. To get this $.39, ZSUN added back badwill amortization and depreciation of $3,000,718, income tax of $3,150,451 for the numerator. ZSUN just assigned 50% weight for the newly issued 9,820,152 reward-shares to get a smaller denominator. The result was that it could inflate the EPS. The suckers would never understand anyway.

If you deduct the second quarter figures from the six month figures, you will have the first and the second quarter income statements. If you compare these two income statements, you will discover that ZSUN's businesses are deteriorating. Since ZSUN has moved the net loss of Moment Internet into discontinued operations, all the other figures in the income statement were from OIA and Momentum Asia.

You will discover that the sales of these two units (85% to 90% from OIA) increased from $14,115,191 to $15,063,161. However, the cost of goods sold increased from $7,463,914 to $10,602,377. This caused the gross profit decreased from $6,651,277 to $4,460,754. This means that OIA has to spend huge amount of money to attract the naive investors now. OIA's growth is finished.

The depreciation and amortization expense increased from $88,360 to $2,912,358. This was mainly from the badwill amortization described in the first paragraph. Generally and administrative expenses decreased from $2,227,254 to $1,371,368. I believe that this was mainly from saving the expenses of unprofitable Momentum Internet Unit. The unrealized gain on marketable securities increased from$45,480 to $3,282,859. This was mainly from recognizing paper gain of AFSI of $3,800,000. As I mentioned in some of my previous posts, ZSUN violated generally accepted accounting principles. According to FASB statement 115, ZSUN cannot add the paper gain of AFSI in its income statement. Shares of AFSI are not trading securities (short-term investment) but are available for sale securities (long-term investment). Especially, those shares are restricted and illiquid. If ZSUN had followed FASB 115, the paper gain could only be included in the total amount of shareholders' equity.

In summary, ZSUN has no growing prospect. OIA's profitability is declining. The game is over. ZSUN is worth not more than $.24.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 1:52:34 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
Frisky calls a turd a turd. RE:fraudulent Tom Haysek/Ray Dirks analyst/meatloaf/meatloaf2

By: frisky $$$
Reply To: 25278 by meatloaf2 $$ Saturday, 19 Aug 2000 at 4:56 PM EDT
Post # of 25295


In my last post, I only offered one opinion: ZSUN is worth no more than 24 cents. The rest are facts or acts done by ZSUN.

Why do you call using Jones & Jensen as an auditor is an opinion? Why do you call using George G Chachas as ZSUN’s counsel is an opinion? Why do you call revising earnings eight time is an opinion? Why do you call exchanging its own shares with DDD, TMOT, LCAI is an opinion? Why do you call using Ray Dirks, Access 1, Security Capital Trading, Stockreporter.com as pseudo-analysts is an opinion? Why do you call lumping gain on sale of AFSI, unrealized and realized gain on marketable securities into operating activities is an opinion? Why do you call misleading investor with EBITDA is an opinion? Why do you call OIA representing 85% to 90% of ZSUN’s revenues is an opinion. Why do you call giving $6,400,000 and over 10 million shares to former OIA shareholders is an opinion? Why do you call those misleading press releases such as over-inflated earnings are opinions? Why do you call violating FASB 115 on the paper gain of AFSI to disguise the loss is an opinion?

Last May, you said ZSUN would be $30 in six to nine months. You must try harder now to pump up this garbage stock.
ragingbull.altavista.com

By: meatloaf2 $$
Reply To: 25273 by frisky $$$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:44 PM EDT
Post # of 25295


OT: Maybe you've been living in a hole, pal, so let me remind you that OJ was found Not Guilty. Your list of grievances are nothing more than renderings of opinion, and ill-informed, grudgingly derived opinions at that.

Fortunately, it's cranks like you that lead the regulators to not bother. So, a tip-o-the-hat to you. Let me know if you want a few more email-regulator addresses to hassle. Glad ta' help ya'.

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 7:37:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
By: frisky $$$
Reply To: None Sunday, 20 Aug 2000 at 6:08 PM EDT
Post # of 25299


If you take a closer look on ZSUN's 10q statements, you will discover that ZSUN has made many transactions to benefit a small group of insiders. The result is that the gullible shareholders are suffered. Moreover, ZSUN hid the loss on its investment in marketable securities with the paper gain of AFSI.

First, in footnote 2 and statement of cash flow, ZSUN indicated that it had paid $5,700,000 to former OIA shareholders because OIA had only generated $5,700,000 net cash during the reward period. The remaining amount of $300,000 is carried as the related party payable in the book. Meaning, it will pay $300,000 to those folks in the near future.

Second, in the current liabilities section, ZSUN reported line of credit for $158,988. In the shares counts, ZSUN indicated that it issued 250,000 shares to Mr. and Mrs. Cox. This means that the acquisition of Asiaprepress and Asia Internet Services has been completed before June 30, 2000. ZSUN probably has paid Mr. and Mrs. Cox $300,000 already.

Third, the receivables from the related parties increased $800,000. ZSUN said that $300,000 was a loan to an officer and $500,000 was a loan to a brokerage house related to Swifttrade. I believe that they are probably the transactions between Momentum Internet and Momentum Asia. Since Momentum Internet was divested, the receivable popped out. I also believe that the $500,000 deposit to McKenna Group might be recorded in this account too.

Fourth, the people behind McKenna Group Entity are Bryant Cragun or Credico Co., Hans Von Meiss. ZSUN paid 100,000 shares of ZSUN to Cragun and Meiss as finders fees for finding ZSUN for McKenna-Ziasun Fund. ZSUN will contribute 100% of money to McKenna-Ziasun Fund. However, it will only receive 60% of the fund assets of first $20,000,000. If the assets are above $20,000,000, ZSUN will only receive 51% of the fund assets above $20,000,000. The McKenna Group Entity (MGE) will receive the rest. Cragun, Meiss do not have to risk a penny, but they will enjoy all the benefits. ZSUN is so generous by giving away the money to related parties. It really treats the other shareholders as suckers. ZSUN deposited $500,000 on April 25, 2000. It will deposit, or may have deposited, $3,000,000 on the date of execution of the agreement. It has scheduled to deposit $2,000,000 on September 1, 2000, $2,500,000 on November 1, 2000, $3,500,000 on January 1, 2001 and $3,500,000 on April 1, 2000. In other words, all the cash generated from OIA will disappear into McKenna-ZSUN Fund. The shareholders immediately will lose at least 40% of their earnings. They will form an LLC called McKenna Venture Accelerator (MVA). MGE will own 25% of MVA, MVA management will own 15%, the investor or McKenna-ZSUN-Fund will own 60% of MVA. The MVA management can charge up to 5% management fee. The complicate transaction makes everyone confuse. The simple conclusion: they are using the money from ZSUN shareholders for risky investments without risking their own money.

Fifth, if you read the first quarter 10q statement, you will discover that its marketable securities had a market value of $1,228,276. In the cash flow statement of the first six months, ZSUN indicated that it had purchased $933,997 of marketable securities. In the cash flow statement of the first quarter, ZSUN said that it had purchased $643,562 of marketable securities. You can figure out that ZSUN purchased additional $291,435 marketable securities. ZSUN did not sell any securities in the second quarter of 2000. However, the ending value of marketable securities decreased to $836,157. This implies that ZSUN's marketable securities have shrunk $683,554. Gee, how much can you learn from OIA, if it does not know how to handle its own money? To cover the paper loss, it reported the paper gain of AFSI of $3,800,000 to cover the loss. As I mentioned before, this is a severe violation of FASB statement 115.

Sixth, on page 15 of the 10q statement on August 17, 2000, ZSUN said that it had 1,800,000 shares of AFSI. However, all the press releases said that it had 1.9 million shares of AFSI. I wonder whether this was just a typo. If not, 100,000 shares of AFSI is unaccountable.

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 7:41:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
"You have BREACHED the most BASIC Principles of GOOD FAITH and CONFIDENTIALITY and I am putting you on PUBLIC NOTICE that I will take whatever action necessary to protect these Principles..."

Funny, Ziasun just got a court order for the defendants to turn over and emails they have. This will make them part of the public record. Soon alll will know. Maybe you can go to the local Kay-man court house and prevent this Francios.

George was swindled. So nice of you to try and help him out.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/20/2000 7:49:11 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10354
 
"OJ was acquitted but everybody on the earth knew he committed the crime"

By: frisky $$$
Reply To: 25263 by xcit $$$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:14 PM EDT
Post # of 25300


OJ was acquitted but everybody on the earth knew he committed the crime.

You must have been very naive and said that ZSUN had done nothing wrong. ZSUN has done many terrible things to mislead the gullible investors. I am just going to give you a few:
(1) Changed its 1998 EPS eight times. The crook accountant offered all 8 versions of financial statements with unqualified opinion. Significantly revised the sales and EPS without offering any explanations. The gullible investors who bought the stock with false and misleading information are suffering.
(2) Did not want to distant itself from the counsel who was convicted in a pump-and-dump scheme.
(3) Portrayed itself as a profitable Internet holding company while 85% to 90% of the revenues from a daytrading seminar subsidiary.
(4) Exchanged its own shares with the related parties. Therefore, it could shift the additional paid-in capital into realized and unrealized gain on marketable securities.
(5) Constantly misled the gullible investors with the EBITDA EPS.
(6) Has never separated the non-operating or non-recurring items such as realized and unrealized on marketable securities, gain on sale of a subsidiary from the operating items. In fact, ZSUN used these items to disguise the poor performance of its Internet businesses. In 1999, more than 60% of the reported earnings are from the sale of AFSI and realized and unrealized gain of marketable securities.
(7) Used the paid touts to masquerade as unbiased financial analysts without disclosing the amount of compensations.
(8) Violated FASB statement 115 by putting the paper gain of AFSI in the income statement to disguise its net loss in the second quarter of 2000. According to FASB statement 115, the paper gain of available for sale securities can only be adjusted in the total shareholders’ equity. Besides, AFSI has no liquidity but has an absurd market capitalization under the tightly controlled float. ZSUN did not even bother to put a footnote to tell the gullible investors.
(9) Constantly used the press released to pump up the stock price. Many of those press releases are either false or exaggerated.
(10) Overpaid former OIA shareholders and carried the badwill in the book so the shareholders would suffer for ten years.

IMHO, ZSUN is worth no more than $.24.

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/21/2000 12:14:55 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 10354
 
FG 666: In no uncertain terms: SCREW YOU. You are a pathological liar and your word means nothing. You live in complete denial of the facts which has made you the pennystock laughing stock of the world thanks to your ludicrous posts.

I dare you to set foot in the US for legal service. I will effing bury you.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/21/2000 10:01:59 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
GOOD CITIZEN FRISKY

By: frisky $$$
Reply To: None Monday, 21 Aug 2000 at 9:56 PM EDT
Post # of 25367


The management will siphone $14,500,000 from ZSUN’s treasury to MecKenna Accelerator Venture between now to April 1, 2001. ZSUN will turn itself to a shell corp. As of June 30, 2000, ZSUN reported that its cash declined from $11,652,505 to $9,312,769 in six months. If we remove the special bonus payment of $5,700,000 to Scott Elder et al., we will discover that ZSUN just generated $3,360,264 cash for the last six months. For the next nine months, let assume that ZSUN will do as well as the last six months. We can estimate that ZSUN will generate cash of $3,360,000/6*9-$300,000 =$4,640,000. Add $9,312,769 to $4,640,000 and the cash saving of $500,000 on discontinuing MII. The total is about $14,500,000. This is too much a coincidence. The management has planned to take the money and run. The gullible shareholders will carry the trash bag

One can predict that by April 1, 2001, ZSUN will have no cash. ZSUN’s share in MAV will be just $9,000,000. Only God knows how much the $9,000,000 will be left after the high risk investment and high management fee.

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)8/28/2000 8:52:26 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
FRANCOIS GOELO DECLARES WAR AGAINST FREE SPEECH, RAGINGBULL AND SI!! STATE FACTS AND TRUTH AND YOUR POSTS WILL BE DELETED. ALL PUMPERS WELCOME

investorshub.com

Posted by: Francois+Goelo
Date: 8/27/00 1:59:53 PM (ET)
In reply to: hybridmsg who wrote msg# 4

Post # of 9

Hybrid and other CYAA POSTERS, a WARM WELCOME on INVESTORSHUB.COM...

This Board will essentially be AUTO-REGULATING, as I think that the Spammers, Bashers and the Crazies won't even bother to post frequently, as they know they can be QUICKLY DELETED by the person who has started the Board...

I REALLY LIKE this Board, because it has CLEARLY be designed by Posting-Investors (my Buddy Fatt Matt) for Posting-Investors and all the GRIPES I had with SI or RB have been COMPLETELY RESOLVED here... Shortly, we'll get CONTENT, Portfolios and QUOTES and you'll soon wonder if you need another Board... I predict that this Message Board will expand tremendously, as the word gets around...

As happened when I moved from SI to RB, I posted on the 2 Boards for a while, then recently 95% of my posting was on RB... Soon, I believe 95% of my posting will be here BUT I plan to maintain a presence on RB for a while longer... Here is a list of the ADVANTAGES I see with InvestorsHub, compared to RB:

+ The ability to quickly delete disgusting posts, those violating privacy, those Bashing with no reasonable reason and those endless Spamming posts, that seem to make about 25% of all posts on RB at present...

+ The ability to edit a post for a few minutes after it has been posted, to correct last minute embarrassing Mistakes or check that a Link posted is actually working...

+ The personal notification that a post has been addressed to me and awaits a reply, instead of having to scan all messages on numerous Threads to see if anything has been posted to my attention...

+ The ability to have Proper Headers, that can be edited, as information change and appear every time a post is clicked on to remind the poster what the Thread is all about...

+ The ability to send and receive Private Messages (PM's), as on SI, for communications with friends, away from the public eye...

+ The current SPEED and the large dimensions of the window to compose messages without having to constantly SCROLL...

+ The RECEPTIVITY of this Management: it knows this Board ONLY EXIST through us, the POSTERS and I believe they'll do all they can to accommodate our NEEDS, within reason... We're NOT dealing with a COLD and IRRESPONSIVE Corporate Structure here, BUT with Pepole JUST LIKE US...

SO BEST of LUCK to CYAA and InvestorsHub.com....

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (9385)5/1/2009 2:15:33 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 10354
 
Frank Goelo (2) 5,000,000 6.4% International Broadcasting Corp/NV · SB-2 · On 5/6/02 secinfo.com
Name and Address of Amount and Nature of Percentage
Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership of Class
Frank Goelo (2) 5,000,000 6.4%
-----------------------------------------------
sec.gov
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 21021 / May 1, 2009
SEC v. Daryn P. Fleming and Mathew C. Bruce, CV-08-029-FVS (E.D. Wa.)
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that on April 14, 2009, the Honorable Robert H. Whaley of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington entered final judgments against Defendants Daryn P. Fleming and Mathew C. Bruce in the above captioned matter, to which Defendants Fleming and Bruce consented, without either admitting or denying the SEC's allegations against them. The final judgments permanently enjoin Defendants Fleming and Bruce from violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The final judgment against Defendant Fleming also prohibits Fleming from acting as the officer or director of any public company, and orders that Fleming pay disgorgement totaling $20,844 in ill-gotten gains, $3,865 in prejudgment interest, and a $35,000 civil penalty.

The SEC previously alleged that Defendant Fleming issued false press releases about the business operations of International Broadcasting Corporation, including nonexistent broadcast affiliations with various radio stations. The SEC has also alleged that when Bruce and Fleming were later questioned by investors about these supposed affiliations, they made public misrepresentations live on an International Broadcasting internet radio show to conceal the fact that the original press releases were false. The SEC previously filed a settled civil injunctive action against International Broadcasting Corporation, in which the company consented to the entry of a permanent injunction from violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 05/01/2009