To: LPS5 who wrote (671 ) 8/19/2000 10:32:51 PM From: Eric Fader Respond to of 1426 I'm watching this discussion with interest and would like to try to bridge the schism between the factions a bit. Of course, the vast majority of the RB conspiracy theorists are buffoons (although Voyager certainly does not appear to fit in that category). But the problem is not that they buy stocks on the OTC-BB -- it's that they buy the ones that are being promoted, and lack the experience to do proper due diligence (and by that I don't mean simply reading the press releases and calling IR <g>). There is no shortage of quality companies on the BB, many of which are at least intermittently profitable and many others of which have innovative technology and may eventually become successful enough to obtain a listing. Anyone here can run a screen to find the ones with PE's, or scan press releases to locate, and then research, the ones with "big ideas" that just might work someday. I trade through a MM, have concentrated on the OTC-BB for many years and consider myself an experienced investor and trader. I enjoy trading the BB because IMO it's much easier outsmarting the RB types than sharp NASDAQ traders and institutions, but I consider myself an "investor" in other BBs that I am quite confident in. Those who bought (former) OTC-BB stocks like SCKT and VETX, for example, under $1.00, or who are patiently waiting for companies like CPSX and MPAD to be "discovered," should not be lumped in with naive buyers of things like TMMI, LOCH, ADVR or BIFS, to name a few, and I think we do a disservice to Voyager and others who lack experience if we do not focus on the real problems. If (but only if) one truly understands how market makers operate, how to read a balance sheet and an MD&A, what a convertible offering means, etc., the OTC-BB can be an enjoyable and lucrative venue in which to trade and, yes, to invest. EDIT: I see that Kerry has posted some similar thoughts in #679.