To: Dayuhan who wrote (85873 ) 8/21/2000 6:28:09 AM From: Neocon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807 Well, I already discussed an aspect of it with cosmicforce. Civil rights was a plus, the creation of the "underclass" was a minus that worsened the overall condition of blacks. Similarly, the general movement towards female equality was good, but the advent of mores that broke down family cohesion and a sense of male responsibility, coupled with easy divorce and other institutional factors, created a worsening situation for women with children, placing more of them in poverty. Although one can argue over whether it was a net loss, it is indisputable that the march of women's right was underway before the '60s (see "Woman of the Year" or "Adam's Rib", both with Katherine Hepburn), and therefore those elements peculiar to the '60s were unnecessary, and likely did more harm than good. The anti- war movement was not so important as you seem to think. Remember, most people supported the war, and Nixon was twice elected. It is, in fact, arguable that the war was prolonged by the anti- war movement, since they stupidly managed to make objection to the war look unpatriotic, and helped to elect Nixon. In any event, the advent of McGovernism, which I helped, in a small way, to support, weakened the American position in the world, and specifically weakened the Democratic Party's stance on foreign affairs. Eventually, of course, it led to the defection of many Democrats to the Republican Party, and the election of Ronald Reagan, which was an effective corrective. Distrust of authority is fine, if it is intelligent. The sort of disaffection that was encouraged by the '60s was mindless cynicism. I have lived too long, and heard too many ridiculous things said about various decades, to believe any longer the myth of the stifling '50s, when the civil rights movement began in earnest, when rock 'n' roll was born, when custom cars and surfing were all the rage. There was no "pendulum": things got out of hand........