Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (107852)	8/21/2000 10:46:53 AM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, Re: Intel engineering management and architecture has clearly fallen behind AMD. How do you support this claim especially the word clearly is used ? "They are just lucky that the engineering management at Sun Microelectronics is even worse" What else do you need :-) gary

To: Scumbria who wrote (107852)	8/21/2000 1:14:30 PM
From: Joey Smith	Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, re:Intel engineering management and architecture has clearly fallen behind AMD. Yeah, those AMD engineers did a great job with those on-cache T-birds. That's why the (generation-behind) CuMine run faster on many benchmarks. Admit it, the T-bird design was a 'C-' at best. Joey

To: Scumbria who wrote (107852)	8/21/2000 9:44:53 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

SCUMbria - Re: "Intel engineering management and architecture has clearly fallen behind AMD. " Then why does Intel OWN the high performance note book market? Then why does Intel OWN the x86 Server market? Then why does Intel OWN the x86 Workstation market? Then why does Intel have the FASTEST x86 CPU in the world? Then why does AMD have NO Dupalon Or AThWiper or ThumperTurd notebook CPUs? Then why has AMD STILL NOT DELIVERED an SMP capable CPU or chip set? Paul