Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: spja who wrote (48580)	8/21/2000 2:45:53 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

I do care very much who is in the important position of appointing people to the Federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. So do I. I agree with you on that issue. And I hesitate to bring this up because I dont want to get into right to life vs choice but what about a womens right to choose and the supreme court? So it isnt as clear on who would be better. All depends on whose ox is being gored. But you would agree that many folks would have split views on trial lawyer and choice, wouldnt you? And that would make your criteria a bit hard to use.

To: spja who wrote (48580)	8/21/2000 2:47:49 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

I'm no fan of Lerach either but looking at the recent appointments (Thomas, Souter) what can you say? Is this the best we can do... I hope not... if you are voting for Bush based on potential supreme court nominees I'm afraid you will be disappointed...