SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (30946)8/21/2000 3:12:27 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
cut for silage, stalks are being used as bedding.
I nor my brother who manages the farm have livestock. He used to have cows, but now he likes to take vacations to visit his daughters and cows are too much trouble to leave alone. All pasture land is rented out.

The harvester my brother has (I don't know the brand but it's red) does not have a rear-spreader for the residue. The exit chute is pointed down and there is a row of chisles and small disk wheels attached to the end of the chute. There is no other implement attached to the back, although you can attach a wagon to the side, but in practice another guy drives a truck along side the harvester to receive the product, or it is just stored in the harvester and transfered to a wagon when it fills up.
TP



To: Ish who wrote (30946)8/21/2000 9:05:24 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
A theoretical farming question for you and TP. New urbanists mourn every acre of farm land turned into housing for people. They say once it's paved over, the farm land is lost forever. But is it?

Theoretically, could you take say a Chicago suburb, tear down the houses, pull up the roads and turn it back into farm land?