Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: not925 who wrote (16019)	8/21/2000 4:58:13 PM
From: Gregg Powers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29987

not925: First and foremost, as I know nothing of your particular circumstances, risk aversion or investment priorities, I am not suggesting that you (or anybody else should for that matter) go out and buy Globalstar. My first post was a statement of perspective written because we were aware that various constituencies would draw conclusions from our SEC filings. We have made an investment decision that contemplates the company’s risk profile, our investors’ risk profile, and at an appropriate commitment level for our assets under management. This having been said, our success as a risk-averse value manager is based on a desire, willingness and capability to think outside the box. We were Qualcomm’s largest shareholder for years during which it would have been difficult to characterize the stock as a value if one were saddled to traditional fundamental analytical metrics. While we adamantly believed that Qualcomm was grossly undervalued, this conviction derived from our understanding of CDMA, the technology’s likely impact on the wireless marketplace, certain customers (read wireless operators) strong preference for it, and our calibration of the value (read cash flow) that would ultimately derive from it. When we bought Qualcomm, conventional wisdom ran diametrically opposed to our conclusions, and as such, we believed that the ensuing discount more than mitigated our risk. We take a similar position with regard to Globalstar. Based on our work with people who are actually marketing the service for a living, we believe the Street is quite out-to-lunch regarding the demand picture. As a consequence, we believe that the current draconian view of an extraordinarily dilutive financing, or even bankruptcy, is substantially out of synch with the most probable business realities. While the bears are banking substantially on the latter, and hoping for the former, I believe that Globalstar’s most probable outcomes contrast quite markedly with their perceptions. Therefore, while we acknowledge that there is not inconsequential risk, we believe that is has been largely impounded into the consolidated valuation of the debt and equity. Simply put, one could argue that our $60 million investment controls in excess of 10% of the economics of an entity that you believe could be worth $40 billion. While I would not venture to be as aggressive as you suggest, I believe the risk/reward ratio to be truly extraordinary. Think about it this way. Wall Street is virtually unanimous in the view that Globalstar is a casket case. As a value-investor, I am a contrarian at heart, so as a baseline this kind of unanimity inevitably stirs my pulse. Now, after carefully perusing the so-called research being spewed from the Street, I find that consensus is predicated on what I have come to be to be a flawed premise, i.e. GSTRF built a network that nobody needs. Not only have most of the believers exited stage right, but every bear and his brother is betting that the company is one step from Chapter eleven. In contrast to this perspective, the service providers that I have spoken with...and remember, these are the people actually selling the service...seem more than satisfied with the progress to date and repeatedly indicate that they do not see demand constraints. The dichotomy between reality and fear of the unknown is maximized. Timing is, of course, everything. Can the stock trade lower? Sure. Can I hope to assemble an economically meaningful position at the bottom? Of course not. The bottom line, however, is that I believe that within a six-month window the company will begin to demonstrate significant operating traction. Once investors come to understand that the bear argument is wrong and there is a significant worldwide demand for the Globalstar service, follow-on financing will not prove to be difficult to accomplish or dilutive enough to compromise our return opportunity. That, by the way, is why the last $250 million in financing was so important. Regardless of Lockheed’s pleasure, or should I say, displeasure, Bernard now has enough time and money to begin proving his business case. Yours is too well considered, and too coyly written, to be a random retail query. While I won’t wish you good luck with your position, I would suggest that you attempt to do some work of your own, sans the Street’s ‘help’.

To: not925 who wrote (16019)	8/22/2000 4:30:01 PM
From: H. Bradley Toland, Jr.	Respond to of 29987

not925, we also are "risk adverse, value investors" that have just finished taking a speculative position (1 to 3% of our total portfolios under management) in Globalstar. I, also, would like to explain our thinking in regards to your question to Mr. Powers regarding portfolio management. Loosely, we define value as investing in companies that have proprietary or monopolistic businesses that we can buy at reasonable prices. Like Mr Powers, companies such as Qualcomm adorn our portfolios as well. To our knowledge, nothing quite like Globalstar exists, anywhere. It's truly a unique business with enormous potential. It boggles our minds that Wallstreet believes there is no demand for such a product. We just rolled over laughing at Mr Sessing's comment from Crowle Weedon the other day when he said the "only" use for the phone was maritime. In regards to short term price swings, to us, they are inconsequential. Timing is a non-issue, as we feel we haven't any control over the price of a stock in the short run. (I wish all of our clients felt that way!) The amount we are willing to pay is another issue. You said, "As value investors should do, what if we looked down before we look up?" If you are insinuating that you only buy companies that go up, give us a call. As for me, almost everything I buy seems to want to go down before up. If Globalstar looks down first, as you put it, we will just live with it. We're confident that our clients will be amply rewarded, in time, for their patience. A year and a half from now isnt' that far away--when cash flow puts the company on a sound footing. In the interim, Globalstar partners will provide the cash flow you seek. In short, while we have purchased quite a few shares in total, we are not over exposing any of our clients to too much stock specific risk. regards, bt