Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (107903)	8/21/2000 4:05:35 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, <When and how does it remove bubbles from the pipeline?> I already answered that. The double-speed ALU has no impact on pipeline bubbles. Its use is to speed up the sections in-between the pipeline bubbles where the real work needs to be done. <There is also the unanswered issue of how it impacts clock speed. Until proven otherwise, I'm inclined to think that the double speed ALU may have been a very bad idea.> Let's see. Pentium 4 can already reach speeds of 1.4 GHz and above on a 0.18u process. I doubt the CPU can run any faster had Intel decided on a single-speed ALU. But hey, maybe questions like this will be answered during this year's Microprocessor Forum. Are you going again? Tenchusatsu