SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (122633)8/21/2000 4:31:45 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571831
 
Tim,

Orientations of magnetic material in the geological record allow scientists to determine the past location of geological materials. Over a period of 50,000,000 years even the continents move around quite a bit.

The north pole is the coldest place in the Northern Hemisphere. If ice at the north pole shows no signs of having melted over 50,000,000 years and it is melted now, the only reasonable conclusion which can be reached is that polar temperatures are at their warmest in 50,000,000 years. Had the ice moved there from some other (warmer) place, that would make the argument even stronger.

Scumbria



To: TimF who wrote (122633)8/21/2000 4:33:35 PM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 1571831
 
Tim,

Good point. I guess somehow should have taken a sample of ice few years ago and tested if some of the layers were 50 million years old (I highly doubt that).

Joe



To: TimF who wrote (122633)8/21/2000 4:41:26 PM
From: manfredhasler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571831
 
OT / Tim, Re: How much can you tell about an area a thousand miles away from where you take samples.

A more direct question would be to ask how we can take samples of the ice that just melted and actually disappeared at the north pole this year to prove anything? But maybe this is not a question, just a argument to continue an endless discussion ...

Regards,
Manfred