SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jill who wrote (30028)8/21/2000 6:30:09 PM
From: RocketMan  Respond to of 35685
 
I'm working up a small simulation, using realistic QQQ
volatility, using a random walk for year-to-year variation,
and using alternate strategies. I started with the KISS
strategy I discussed earlier, and got my head handed to me
almost every year.

Now I have a better strategy, in which I only buy CCs when
the price at the end of the month is higher than my
original purchase price. Otherwise, I dip into my stock
account for income. I do much better, but still have some
down years. Now, keep in mind that I am taking a bad (not
worst) case, in which the stock is only going sideways. In
such cases, one might as well do a CD.

Here are some sample results. I won't repeat all the
numbers, just the bottom line yearly gain/loss, using the
KISS strategy and an alternate (but still simple) strategy,
and not biasing this in any way. The alternate strategy is
that I only do CCs during those months in which the price
is higher than my original strike. Otherwise, I dip into
my account for income.

I am just going to put in the returns over ten (simulated)
years, and have not run the model yet. The numbers will be
whatever come out of the model. Here they are:

Year KISS % Alternate KISS %
---- ------ ----------------
1 -29 -23
2 -13 -40
3 30 106
4 17 67
5 -17 -15
6 38 164
7 15 36
8 15 87
9 -10 46
10 -10 33

Avg 3.6 46.1

Notice that in the KISS method you can lose big time
in some years. Even with the alternate strategy, you
can still lose big some years, but you have more good
years. Of course, any tweaking of this from market
timing, buyback, rolling up/down, etc, can minimize
risk. Which, I suppose, is why McMillan can write a
500-page book on this stuff.

Interestingly, the KISS approach did just about what you
would get from a CD.

The more I do of this, the more I understand some of
V's comments, which means he is either brilliant,
lucky, highly intuitive, or all of the above.
Then again, maybe it really is those angels :-)

Man, this is really cutting into my sailing time.