Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric K. who wrote (122723)	8/22/2000 12:47:23 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578765

ted-- I don't apprekiate people misspelling my name, especially when they present specious arguments at the same time. Besides, I think John's argument was foul, and Windsock must really be sucking wind to come up with such weak posts. Perhaps they will be a little more thoughtful in regards to praising Engle the Hun for demeaning everyone who does not share his theory of the "suckers" who buy AMD. Eric, Windsock is Windsock.... J Fowler has a different viewpoint since he is a long term Intel long that recently has bought some AMD. Given the nature of the Intel bias from a year ago, thats impressive. However he's not going to echo the AMD rhetoric that has become almost like a mantra on these threads. Frankly, I think for too many AMD longs they're love of the stock has become like a mania....and a certain clarity is being lost. And I know you know that. I like to hear John's and Frank's and AmyJ's viewpoints because I think they are smart people and they help me to maintain my clarity. At the same time, I recognize they have an Intel bias. But yet they are open enough to admit they may have misjudged AMD and are willing to at least trade the stock. So I listen to what they have to say...its not going to hurt me and I may learn something. ted