SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Marsh who wrote (4039)8/22/2000 11:47:19 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13060
 
That's not the way most constitutional scholars read the amendment. You cited nothing but your own opinion in support of your position.



To: William Marsh who wrote (4039)12/2/2000 10:13:07 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 13060
 
Because of the introductory subordinate clause, which speaks of the need for a well ordered militia.

It speaks of the need for a well regulated militia but does not say anything about the right of the people to keep and bear arms being limited to members of the militia or
contingent on the existence of a militia.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News