SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wlheatmoon who wrote (49765)8/22/2000 4:59:21 PM
From: J.B.C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
Here's a crude analogy but near the point:

You are purchasing internet connection for your home computer and you have 2 choices in your area, 7.7 kbps (remember those old original modems, ugh) or ISDN connection speed, AND most likely the ISDN connection is being offered at a cheaper rate. Which will you chose. You don't need to know that CDMA is the technology that is giving you your ISDN speed, you just know that that's what you want.

Jim



To: wlheatmoon who wrote (49765)8/22/2000 5:06:04 PM
From: CRay33  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
Consumers WILL understand CDMA from GSM when their GSM phone only allows 20 kbs data rates through GPRS - while others companies are advertising 384 kbs through CDMA. The GPRS advocates are now admitting that original rates were 'ideal' and not typical. Ideal only matters if your the only cellphone user on the network - LOL.

Fortress Europe is playing hardball - but unfortunately, this much of a technology gap will overcome politics.

The gap is growing - QCOM's HDR is up to 2.4Mbs. Would you go out and buy a 2400 baud modem when you know a 56000 is available?

Those carriers investing in CDMA will win in the long run - until then, it's a wireless holy war.