Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Net Perceptions, Inc. (NETP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vocco_the_punk who wrote (2778)	8/23/2000 6:41:34 AM
From: bernieb2	Respond to of 2908

For those of you who did not already know... The last poster has trashed this stock using multiple personalities on various boards, and was a promoter of it at 45 perdicting it was going to double soon. (Indicated he/she had some sort of inside information). Now has some sort of attachment to Victor and will do anything and everything to get him. Aliases such as Victor_su_cks, BernieFAg, etc is an indication of his/her obsession. The only thing he/she continues to hype is how the stock went from 66 (briefly on 1/2/2000) to 11's. If your investing in this stock you probably know this and figure it's a beaten down stock which could soar any day. Now this person is claiming Victor has multiple personalities (he did change his name on Yahoo ONCE. And multipersonality him/herself is trying to attack Victor for the same thing. He acts as though he has "credible," "informed," knowledge; all the while is simply trying to trash the stock in any way possible for the final point or two on the short, which we believe was long from 45 to about 28, then seemed to short and is trying to get any extra point possible to recoup his/her losses from when he/she was long. You really have to wonder what his/her personal motives are...

To: Vocco_the_punk who wrote (2778)	8/25/2000 8:47:53 AM
From: Smear_campaign	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2908

Actually, I was wondering what your personal motives are. If you don't like the stock why don't you give specifics rather than attack someone you don't know? Think you could add a little more than, "this sucka's going down"? As far as I am concerned a 30-50% quarterly sequential growth, 150 million in the bank, and a leader in their domain at its low is pretty much a steal. With that growth, and in the niche it is in, if it doesn't rise by its own accord it will be bought out. Sorry you bought at 66. Regarding the multiple aliases, maybe the kettle shouldn't be calling the cauldron black, Jake? I will be in heavily today.