SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pezz who wrote (30)8/23/2000 9:27:08 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
Rejecting Clinton's 8 trillion dollar health care plan had nothing to do with it?



To: pezz who wrote (30)8/23/2000 10:30:00 AM
From: DavesM  Respond to of 10042
 
One aspect that most people are missing about the debt, is that during the Clinton Administration, interest rates declined, meaning that the cost of financing the debt is less. In addition, I believe the Clinton Administration has been retiring long term debt, and shifting it to shorter term instruments (normally short term Government paper has a lower yield than long term). With a 5 trillion public debt, every 1% overall reduction in bond rates means a 50 billion decrease in interest payments to the debt. Unfortunately if short term interest rates continue to climb, you may see the surplus shrink relatively quickly.



To: pezz who wrote (30)8/23/2000 8:21:41 PM
From: James West  Respond to of 10042
 
yes, more tax revenues due to a booming stock market that all began in 1994 after the republicans took the house and senate. and the 1990 budget deal also contributed. the economy recovered before clinton even took office. i'm always curious as to what clinton actually did to improve the econmony. go back on his word and raise taxes?