Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (108089)	8/23/2000 11:58:30 AM
From: semiconeng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Where in that quote did Pijpker say that Compaq asked Intel to cancel the Xeon 800? The entire quote was in generalities. I guess you missed the ENTIRE point. Dan was putting forth the ASSUMPTION that intel cancelled the 800MHz Xeon because of some manufacturing problem. Weather Compaq APECIFICALLY stated "STOP MAKING THEM", or only "suggested" they stop making them, is irrelevant. The point is.... NO MANUFACTURING PROBLEM WITH XEON 800MHZ EXISTS..... Got it now?????? SemiconEng

To: GVTucker who wrote (108089)	8/23/2000 11:58:53 AM
From: semiconeng	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Where in that quote did Pijpker say that Compaq asked Intel to cancel the Xeon 800? The entire quote was in generalities. I guess you missed the ENTIRE point. Dan was putting forth the ASSUMPTION that intel cancelled the 800MHz Xeon because of some manufacturing problem, and Ali Chen suggested they were lying about there not being a manufacturing problem. Weather Compaq SPECIFICALLY stated "STOP MAKING THEM", or only "SUGGESTED" or "INFERRED" that they should stop making them, is irrelevant. They said they don't want 100MHz bumps in speed. The point is.... NO MANUFACTURING PROBLEM WITH XEON 800MHZ EXISTS..... Got it now?????? SemiconEng