Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (86191)	8/23/2000 3:32:55 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Since I don't follow her around from thread to thread (as she likes to believe) I didn't see her hypocrisy on Rambi. I see she spreads her venom evenly.

To: average joe who wrote (86191)	8/23/2000 3:41:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Good try sweety, but for all your research each of those posts can be distinguished on the grounds of their subject matter. As usual you have no understanding of the underlying discussions. I would, if I had the leisure that you have, go into a full discussion of this with you. But since I have a life, I think I'd rather tend to it. January 18th 1998????? and all you could find was that post on parental rights NOT in the context of international rights and ONLY in the context of parental behavior damaging to a child (I know I know - don't tell me again how you think living in Cuba is the WORST thing anyone could do to their kid- I don't buy it) How much time are spending combing throught my posts? I think I ought to be flattered, but what I really am is AMAZED that this is all you have to do with your time. Oh and one MORE thing- as a devotee of Mr. Smart where is all your positive energy? Your devotion to not judging people, and realizing they are where they need to be, and being full of light? Are you, prehaps, a really really big hyporcite? I already know the answer to that. It's a big Average YES.

To: average joe who wrote (86191)	8/23/2000 4:13:47 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Oh dear, Joe. I think you are very confused. X remained consistent and logical in her analysis of the Elian situation. She never viewed returning Elian to his father as being abusive or damaging, and thus there is no hypocrisy in her statements regarding parental rights and Elian. I think you are confusing your own views with hers. Had YOU uttered that statement about parental rights and then taken the stand you did on Elian, it would be hypocritical; for X, it was absolutely consistent.

To: average joe who wrote (86191)	8/23/2000 6:53:58 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Maybe the dynamic between her and eBill isn't all that healthy. This gang-up stuff is kinda repulsive. But, uh, wasn't the accusation that of having a potty mouth and not simply disagreeing with someone or saying something you don't like (like your examples)? I'm not seeing anything unusual other than the opinion expressed in the posts. And actually kind of agree with her on them. It's strange you'd bring this stuff here. Why don't you go discuss it where it happened. Maybe they are interested. But since you apparently are seeking validation, inuendo is a lot different than calling someone a "skank". Now if she said, "That's because you were j*rking off" and NOT "I think you can thank your five fingers." I'd agree - but, she didn't. You inferred that meaning. It was intended, but it wasn't said. That's the difference. Go look: Message 14099456