SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FastC6 who wrote (31871)8/23/2000 11:04:34 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 769667
 
Politics and Wall Street
Which candidate is best for your portfolio?

By Frank Cappiello, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:57 PM ET Aug 23, 2000
NewsWatch
Latest headlines

NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Wall Street's focus is now shifting from the
Federal Reserve to politics.

What is now known is that the Federal Reserve's
rate policy will be on hold for the rest of the year.
The benchmark Fed funds rate at the end of
December will be the same as it is today: 6.5
percent. What is still unknown is the next president's
identity.

Myth has it that most of Wall Street is conservative
and, accordingly, favors the Republican Party. The
fact is that, historically, the stock market does better
when the Democrats are in power. Further, since
World War II, the stock market has tended to
underperform in years with a single-party majority in
the government (that is, House and Senate majorities
and a president of the same party).

Most recently (since 1990), the stock market, like
the voting population, seems to enjoy "gridlock" -- a
president of one party and a Congress controlled by
the other. Apparently, Americans like the additional checks and balances
beyond those outlined in the Constitution and incremental rather than
sweeping political change.

With the U.S. budget surplus growing, and the probability of large spending
programs or big tax cuts, we believe that the stock market would again
prefer mixed results in November; that is a president of one party and
Congress controlled by the other.

The answer to the question of which president would
be best for the country continues to be debated. On
the other hand, which president would be best for
Wall Street depends on the stock groups you own or
are planning to own.

Bush would be boon to defense companies

A Bush presidency would favor spending more on
aerospace and defense. That's a plus for United
Technologies (UTX: news, msgs), among others.
The energy sector would also benefit, particularly oil
drilling, and the health-care sector (drugs, HMOs)
would feel less threatened by new regulation. Two
specific stock beneficiaries would be Microsoft
(MSFT: news, msgs) and Philip Morris (MO: news,
msgs).

Under Bush, the "new" Justice Department could be
more amenable to an easier Microsoft settlement.
Philip Morris would benefit on the basis of the same
rationale. Finally, a Bush administration would cut
taxes thereby placing more discretionary income in
the hands of the consumer to spend (retail stocks) or
save (financial stocks).

Gore would be boon to environmental stocks

A Gore administration will be tougher on energy. It would place increased
pressure on the health-care companies, particularly in the prescription and
Medicare arena. Further, environmental stocks would see sales and
earnings climb as the Gore administration pursues its environmental goals.

More importantly, one of the duties of the new president will be the ability
to swing the Supreme Court majority to conservatism or keep it moderately
liberal, since there will be a high probability that the White House will
appoint two and possibly three new Supreme Court justices during the next
four-year term.