Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LiPolymer who wrote (21212)	8/24/2000 1:40:26 AM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

Post some back up regarding negative block money flow and declining institutional ownership, or accept the reasonable doubting of your "facts". Negative Block money flow is a fact. If it is important to you, find the confirmation. It is there. Stick to what was posted and not to what you conjure and try to attribute. Draw your own conclusions. Doubt all you want. It doesn't alter the facts. "... repetitive posting ...." LOL You raised the question several times today. I simply responded. Don't ask questions to which you don't want to hear the answers. "Looks like touting ..." You are more impressionable than previously thought. "SNRS" "MCOM" "WSTL" "VLNC" By your definition, four stock symbols, four touts. LOL I own alot more stocks ... You have previously claimed ownership of the 4 in the chart. They are all down YTD. You can call it anything. But you must call it a loss. " ... who try to mislead others with one-sided "analysis", attempted deception (posting stale links) and outright lies (e.g. ULBI contract with Nokia)." Try misleading by posting facts. I can't do it. It is not possible to deceive without intent. With all of your allegations, all you can cite is a misread of a not so clear press release. It wasn't an OEM contract but, it was evidence of more li poly competition hitting the market. VLNC has claimed no relationship with Nokia. It appears Nokia uses batteries manufactured by someone other than VLNC. That is a key point on this thread. Try as you might you can't distort it. As much as you want to believe that questions about VLNC's competitive position cannot be true, you are unable to find and post credible examples of the alleged false statements you repeatedly allege. I know why you cannot find them. They don't exist. On the other hand, anyone can here find numerous claims of information allegedly gleaned from mysterious sources that, if it were true, would be positive, material news. The claims do not come to pass. When it happens repeatedly it becomes a campaign to misrepresent at best.