SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (108321)8/25/2000 10:40:51 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,

With the P4 running at 20 - 40% faster than a P3 or AThWiper, what difference will it make?

I think you may be a little too optimistic. AMD is supposed to be at 1.5 GHz in Q1 2001. Do you expect P4 to be at 1.8 GHz - 2.1 GHz? I don't think it is going to happen in Q1 2001.

Joe



To: Paul Engel who wrote (108321)8/25/2000 12:50:34 PM
From: Doug M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul or thread, I think that I read recently that the P4 crossover date where more P4's are shipped than P3's should take place sometime in Q3 2001. Does this sound accurate to you, or do you think it sounds early considering Intel probably needs .13um to really start cranking out high volumes?

According to Barrett, .13 should come on line in mid 2001 and obviously it won't mature for a while.
Also, do you know if Intel will go with .13um and 300mm wafers and copper all at the same time?

Thanks,
Doug



To: Paul Engel who wrote (108321)8/25/2000 2:06:02 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,

Jerry says all of the 1100Mhz Athlons are from Dresden, and most of the 1000Mhz Athlons are from Dresden.

Somehow that data disputes your fantasy that copper doesn't have any advantages.......

No wonder you like AMD!

sTeViE