Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (24966)	8/25/2000 2:12:02 PM
From: Agenda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29970

He should believe me. I have no agenda other than to expose you. You offered your "help". From there it is a fast trip to controlling your "students", and from my experience, charging hefty "tuition". You are a powerless peon who has failed as a participant in society at large, and hence you hide here and derive some sort of self justification by vomiting invectives against all. You are a liar, period.

To: ahhaha who wrote (24966)	8/26/2000 2:59:15 AM
From: KW Wingman	Respond to of 29970

"Nut, I see you're a strong believer in the credibility of Elmer Fudd. Sticks and stones can break my bones but names will never hurt me. <g> I have had no reason to question the credibility of Jduffy. OTOH, you seem to take pride in being a Dissembler, you have even posted that you make deceptive posts, why should someone believe you then? Before you make your baseless accusations check with quasar_I and he will tell you I continually recommended CIEN before Fudd begged me to take him on as an student. Also, Raymond Duray may remember my recommendations on it on Frank's thread where you have been barred. Not baseless - see my reason above. If you want to make me publicly admit I made a baseless accusation then show me the post where you recommended CIEN as you stated above. I can show you where you recommended against buying HLIT to H Walker. About that time I bought 2000 HLIT at split adjusted less than 6 bucks and sold half at 28 and the rest @ 122. I have since bought some of it back at a lower price through CUBE distribution. I> and shows just what kind of an asshole you are. I worked on ships and drilling rigs with men not whimps, yur now talkin my lingo. If you are trying to hurt me, calling me an asshole ain't gon'ta cut it. If you want to hurt me you will have to prove that I was wrong about something, don't call me a name such as "Nut". I hate being wrong almost as much as you hate being straightforward. Barred from Frank's thread is incredible < No it is was very easy. I just said a few things one or more people didn't like and they banned me from the church. That is sort of like saying something about evolution in a church full of serious bible thumpers. The response of those free thinkers is to burn all the books about evolution after stringing the heretics up. If anyone is interested in this they need to read the last part of the old Franks thread I probably need to go into this subject in the future if you persist. Kachina is another person who wrote dared to mention the possibility of evolution to the loyal flock and is also barred from posting on the new FAC (non free speech) thread. Message 13990497 To: Srexley who wrote (1769) From: Kachina Monday, Jul 3, 2000 9:46 PM ET Reply # of 1771 It seems to me that I have been very careful to give these guys the benefit of the doubt. I understand that you have suffered and were involved in Silkroad. Having studied confidence games, well, it is usually the pigeons who are the greatest defenders. Sorry, that's the way things are. Regarding the basics errors in physics, I would suggest that you take the Silkroad white paper to your local community college or high school, and ask the physics teacher to find the errors. There is one glaring one that is so basic it is ridiculous. Again, my reasons for not saying what those errors are, are quite simple. You can see them posted elsewhere. It's a civic duty in a capitalist system to raise issues like this. *************** If you recall, You and Frank started the Silkroad thread. Message 6332420 I'll get this one going with a core excerpt from the company's site: Scientific Breakthrough blah blah blah The company is bust and has been called a scam. You and Frank posted the majority of the posts on the thread and thus gave a certain amount of credibility to the company. Do you have any regrets about this now that so many pre ipo investors (lets call them pigeons in this case) such as Srexley lost money?