Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (21278)	8/25/2000 4:25:27 PM
From: ikonoklast53	Respond to of 27311

Noway, "As far as consistency goes, if you think is virtuous to be consistently loyal to a company that has failed to live up to every expectation it has ever set forth, then you've got me." Are you referring to ULBI? OEMs are not only showing interest in VLNC's batteries...their buying!

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (21278)	8/25/2000 4:31:33 PM
From: Robert Cohen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Well Larry, do you post on Yahoo as Nowaynohow? Yes or no? Did you once tout DW as a reason to take a long position in VLNC? Yes or no? Have you since trashed him? Yes or no? Do you now have a postion in the stock? Yes or no? Do you think ULBI is a better investment? Yes or no? Did you not support Wexlar when he averaged up his short position while the stock rose from $5 to $40 and claimed that VLNC management was fraudulently promoting the stock? Challenging others re their opinions is fair game and I will be the first to admit that some here have been wrong re their forecasts. To take that to the next step and calling people frauds and paid touts is something else. I am challenging your honesty an integrity. Are you honest enough to provide answers to the above questions?