Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Emulex, What Prospects? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sabrejet who wrote (534)	8/25/2000 7:12:34 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 788

you got that right, all the way down from the sec, naz, press, mm, the brokers, all them owe me money, I know it will be cold day in hell before I see any or at all, I don't care something will have to change, heads should roll. Greg

To: Sabrejet who wrote (534)	8/25/2000 8:23:28 PM
From: stomper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 788

Judas priest, to call school off for a snow day you have to have a school code to call into a radio or t.v. station...how hard is it to require a code on a company before their PR is published. Astonishing. -dave

To: Sabrejet who wrote (534)	8/26/2000 7:17:20 PM
From: Sr K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 788

The release was bogus on its surface for anyone who understands normal procedures. Such a release if real would have to be "filed" with NASDAQ prior to dissemination, and I believe the SEC (followed later by an 8-K), which would have led to a trading halt immediately, allowing fair dissemination. In addition, this was so soon after the FY end and audit, that it was suspicious. When I saw EMLX on the %down list, and checked the website and saw nothing after August 22, I wondered ... and by that time it was 10:40.