SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (108394)8/25/2000 8:37:00 PM
From: Eric K.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony Vile-- If you are referring to the advertising on the pages, there is some element of randomness to it, though definitely a greater frequency of Intel-based products. If it were mostly AMD advertising, I'm sure you wouldn't fail to indicate that this is due to a lack of demand without Gateway pushing AMD systems on the customer. The advertising was mostly AMD back in January/February, so you can interpret the present situation as 1) Athlon systems don't need to be pushed as much anymore or 2) Athlon systems couldn't be pushed. I think based on Waite's public statements at the cc, 1) is the more accurate choice. To each his or her own, however.

The salient features of the Gateway pages (as related to AMD) are an Athlon-based "Select" system available after clicking on the "Desktops" option from five of the six pages, and no Athlon notebooks or corporate lines. Gateway doesn't use K6-xs, which makes the absolute number of AMD based systems you see small. If you weighted based on revenue to the cpu maker and adjusted for Gateway's not overly strong corporate presence, I think you would see parity and perhaps a slight AMD bias.

-Eric

c.c: not apprekiated ;-)



To: Tony Viola who wrote (108394)8/25/2000 9:12:31 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Intel backs away from CDMA chip market

By Mark LaPedus
Semiconductor Business News
(08/25/00, 01:20:02 PM EDT)

SAN JOSE -- In a setback for its fledging cellular-phone semiconductor business,
Intel Corp. is quietly backing away from the CDMA chip set market as part of a
plan to focus on new and more promising wireless-IC segments, SBN has
learned.

The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company entered the IS-95-compliant chip-set
market for code-division multiple access handsets only eight months ago after
agreeing to acquire cell-phone IC specialist DSP Communications Inc. for $1.6
billion (see Oct. 14, 1999, story). But Intel had little luck in garnering design wins
in CDMA, due in part to stiff competition from the leading supplier of chip sets in
this booming business-Qualcomm Inc. of San Diego, analysts said.

Instead of CDMA, Intel will focus more on developing and selling cell-phone chip
sets for other digital-cellular standards, such as TDMA (time-division multiple
access), PDC (Personal Digital Communications), and third-generation (3G)
wireless, according to Ronald Smith, vice president and general manager of Intel's
Wireless Communications and Computing Group.

"We are not focusing on the CDMA market," Smith said in an interview the Intel
Developer Forum in San Jose this week. "We're still selling the PDC chip set. We
announced a TDMA chip set. We are also interested in wideband-CDMA
[W-CDMA], but [IS-95-compatible] CDMA is more of a proprietary market."

Smith's comments were made in reference to Qualcomm.'s dominant position in
the CDMA chip set market. Though Qualcomm has licensed its CDMA chip
technology to several IC vendors--including Intel, LSI Logic, Philips, and
PrairieComm--the San Diego company had a 89% share in the worldwide
IS-95-compliant, CDMA-based chip set market in 1999, according to Hambrecht &
Quist LLC of San Francisco.

When Intel acquired DSPC last October, however, the Santa Clara-based
company hoped to give Qualcomm a run for its money in CDMA. At that time,
Intel was expected to leverage its vast resources and fab capacity to grab
significant market share away from a much smaller entity in Qualcomm.

Competitors believed that Intel was never a factor. "Intel had a few design wins,
but I never saw them in the market," said Johan Lodenius, senior vice president of
marketing and product management for Qualcomm's CDMA Technologies
Division, the chip and software arm of the company.

Now, Intel is looking for new and better opportunities in the cell-phone IC market,
such as non-CDMA chip set lines, RISC-based controllers, flash memories, and
other devices, according to Smith. "The [cell-phone] market is very robust," Smith
said. "The demand for our flash memories and other products is also very robust."

Smith added that Intel is more bullish on a next-generation CDMA standard called
W-CDMA, which is being endorsed by Motorola, Nokia, NTT, and other large
OEMs and carriers. In theory, 3G enables cell-phone products to obtain wireless
data at speeds up to 2-Mbits.

3G is expected to be deployed in Japan in 2001, followed by Europe and the
United States. With Japan looking to take the lead in 3G, Intel wasted no time in
finding a partner in that nation. Last May, in fact, Intel and Mitsubishi Electric
Corp. announced a deal to co-develop a chip set for 3G-enabled cell phones.

The company also has high hopes for a new line of chips for cellular-phones,
PDAs, and other products. Introduced this week at the Intel Developer Forum in
San Jose, the company's new XScale product is a new architecture designed for
low-power, handheld equipment (see Aug. 23 story).

Intel is also co-developing a promising line of digital signal processors (DSPs) with
Analog Devices Inc., which will be a key part of the company's cell-phone chip
strategy, Smith said. "(The DSP) is on schedule," Smith said. "We expect to
disclose the details later this year."

Analysts believe the DSP from the Intel/ADI duo will be not be shipped until the
end of this year. "My guess is that Intel won't disclose anything about the DSP
until November," said analyst Will Strauss of Forward Concepts Co., based in
Tempe, Ariz.



To: Tony Viola who wrote (108394)8/25/2000 10:41:57 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony & Intel Investors - This SUN Cover Up Story is
absolutely mind boggling !

SUN has SEVERE RELIABILITY PROBLEMS with their Top-Of-The Line UltraSparc II Enterprise servers !!!!

If Intel did this, they would have been out of business 2 years ago.

infoworld.com

Sun admits to memory problem

By Jaikumar Vijayan, ComputerWorld


PROBLEMS WITH A memory component that Sun Microsystems has been quietly trying to fix for the past several months are continuing to plague some large users of Sun's Ultra Enterprise Unix servers. And Sun has gone to extraordinary lengths to keep its customers quiet about the issue.



The problem involves an external memory cache on Sun's UltraSPARC II microprocessor module. Under certain conditions it has been triggering system failures and frequent server reboots at dozens of customer locations.



Sun Executive Vice President John Shoemaker this week acknowledged that the company has been grappling with memory-related problems on "a few dozen" of its Ultra Enterprise servers for nearly a year.



Sun customers who have been affected by the problem are unwilling to speak openly about it because Sun has persuaded many of them to sign nondisclosure agreements, said Tom Henkel, an analyst at Gartner, in Stamford, Conn.



The nondisclosure agreements were apparently offered with a claim that signing them would bolster Sun's commitment to resolving the problem quickly, Henkel said. Sun customers began reporting the problem as long as 18 months ago, he said.



Shoemaker this week acknowledged that it may have been a bad idea for Sun to get its users to sign nondisclosure agreements. But he said the company took that measure only because Sun itself was struggling to pinpoint a reason for the system failures. He added that Sun has stopped requiring such agreements.



The long-standing nature of the problem and Sun's handling of the issue raise troubling questions about the quality of Sun's hardware and support, Henkel said.



One high-profile customer that has had very public problems with Sun hardware is eBay. The online auctioneer has suffered a series of hardware-related outages over the past year including one this week. It is unclear whether eBay's problems are related to the memory issue, however.



Gartner plans soon to release an advisory on the memory component issue, updating one released in November because of continued and "frequent client complaints of persistent downtime" caused by the problem.



Sun insisted this week that the problem hasn't caused any data loss for customers. But the frequency of reboots disrupts availability and can cause data loss if applications don't restart properly, users said.



In the past year, Henkel said, he has talked with at least 50 Sun customers who complained of hardware reliability issues caused by defective memory. Systems affected by the problem appear to be those based on 400MHz UltraSPARC-II CPU modules using either a 4MB or 8MB cache.



"There are a lot of very unhappy campers out there," Henkel said. "Sun has been experimenting for too long now to find a solution to this problem."



Meta Group, in Stamford, Conn., also has clients that have experienced the problem.



"There was a rash of reliability issues relating to this problem in the March-to-April time frame," though none since then, said Meta Group analyst Brian Richardson. Eight out of 20 of Meta's large Sun accounts reported the problem, Richardson said.



According to Shoemaker, the issue has triggered a massive overhaul of Sun's quality processes and has already directly resulted in about eight major hardware and software changes being incorporated into Sun's Ultra Enterprise server line.



Palo Alto, Calif.-based Sun has also put in place far more rigorous quality and availability testing of its products and is mandating more stringent audits of customer sites, environmental conditions, and planned configurations before taking orders on its high-end servers, Shoemaker said.



By year's end, Sun will release a mirrored memory module that should address this issue once and for all, Shoemaker added. In the past several months, Sun has also been in direct contact with the CIOs at several of the affected companies to explain Sun's new quality initiative, he said.



"This has been a watershed event for Sun," Shoemaker said, adding that the company has moved from the back of the class to class leader with respect to quality.



But according to an MIS manager in North Carolina who has experienced the memory problem and who spoke on condition of anonymity, Sun has offered no explanation for the problems. "Sun has not disclosed any information to me about their memory issues -- not even a brief description," the manager said.



In the past three months, all of the manager's six Sun servers have crashed because of memory-related problems, he said. In each instance, Sun swapped out entire CPU modules but offered no explanation for doing so, he said.



A user at a Midwestern manufacturing company, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, had a similar experience.



"As soon as we reported the issue to Sun, the affected processors were replaced under service contract," he said. The company was able to resolve the problem by rearranging "our data center with the express purpose of lowering system temperatures," he said. "The systems run 10 to 15 degrees Fahrenheit cooler than before, and we haven't seen a problem since."



According to Shoemaker, Sun hasn't been able to narrow the problem to any one specific cause. Sun believes the problems may have been caused by a combination of factors, including defective components from one of Sun's suppliers, poor packaging of the memory chips on the system boards, and environmental factors.



For more enterprise computing news, go to www.computerworld.com . Copyright (c) 2000 Computerworld, Inc. All rights reserved. Meghan Holohan contributed to this report.

Interested in receiving breaking technology news in your e-mailbox every day?