SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (670)8/26/2000 1:20:38 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 8/25/00 [EMLX] TheStreet.com: Shock Wave: The Anatomy of the Emulex Fiasco; Once Bitten: Lessons From the Emulex Hoax

Shock Wave: The Anatomy of the Emulex Fiasco
By Dan Colarusso and Peter Eavis
Staff Reporters
8/25/00 6:07 PM ET

When Emulex (EMLX:Nasdaq - news) stock plunged Friday morning, investors assumed it was business as usual: Just another market darling headed for the scrap heap.

But this was no garden-variety blowup. At the end of trading Friday, questions surrounding Emulex's plunge were far from resolved. Regulators and exchange authorities were examining the possibility of illegal trading and Wall Street was recalling the aftermath of past press-release hoaxes. Some investors who sold on the first whiff of bad news were surely in the red at day's end. Meanwhile, the company said it was on track to meet all projections and to keep growing.

So unfolded the most jarring day this summer on Wall Street.

Steep Plunge

A press release posted around 9:30 a.m. EDT on the Internet reported an earnings restatement, a top executive's departure and a probe of accounting regularities by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The individual investors and money managers who had ridden Emulex to a 171% gain since mid-April started dumping their stock.

By 10:32 a.m., when Nasdaq halted Emulex trading, the stock, which had fallen as much as 62%, was down 51%.

"It went from 100 to 70 in three or four minutes," says one New York brokerage trader. "People were hitting the stock wherever they could, 5 and 6 points below the bid and offer." Ultimately the stock slid as low as 45, more than 67 points below its Thursday close.

"There were some massive offers in the stock," the New York trader says, noting that mutual funds, hedge funds, endowments and pension plans owned roughly 70% of it.

The Means of Production

The perpetrator of the fraud used Internet Wire, a public relations distribution service in Los Angeles, to spread the word. The charge for a release like the one that briefly took $2.5 billion of market capitalization out of Emulex: $325. Internet Wire is a six-year-old operation, a spokesman says, emphasizing that it is cooperating with authorities.

Whatever the hoax's origin, it was dutifully picked up by the major business wires and television stations. That served to stir the masses.

That said, the manager of one New York-based hedge fund that owns Emulex and didn't sell Friday says he was initially suspicious when he saw the press release: "It was so juvenile. It capitalized words for no reason." In addition, he thought it odd that trading in the stock was halted after the press release was issued, since companies typically request a halt before they issue big news.

Indeed, the release's headline highlights a supposed SEC investigation and the resignation of the CEO. But the text of the release fails to mention those actions. The text rambles about restated fiscal fourth-quarter results and promises further information at 5 p.m. EDT.

In any case, once trading resumed at 1:30 p.m. EDT, Emulex stock jumped, quickly regaining most of the ground lost in the morning.

The Aftermath

Now begins the hunt for the perpetrator. An FBI spokesman says both its New York and Los Angeles offices are looking into the hoax.

The Chicago Board Options Exchange said the "unusual" trading in Emulex options Friday "has triggered an intense investigation." The options also trade on the American Stock Exchange, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange and the Pacific Exchange. The PHLX and P-Coast said they are also looking into the trading in the options. The Amex has a policy not to comment on possible investigations.

The incident is reminiscent of last year's hoax involving PairGain, in which a phony news story was planted on an Internet message board saying the company was being acquired. The FBI caught up a week later with Gary Hoke, the 25-year-old company employee who planted the story.

When Hoke posted the fake Bloomberg story on a message board on April 7, 1999, PairGain jumped 30% before the hoax was exposed. It closed up 10% that day. PairGain was subsequently acquired by broadband player ADC Telecommunications (ADCT:Nasdaq - news) for $18.92 a share, less than a dollar above the hoax-takeout price.

In August of last year, Hoke was sentenced to five years' probation and five months of home detention and ordered to pay $92,000 in restitution to 30 investors deemed victims.

Stunning

One lucky soul is Tom Bleakley, manager of the Nicholas Applegate Small Cap Growth fund. He sold out of the stock recently because it got too big for his fund. But the hoax stunned him.

"I've never seen anything like this," Bleakley says. "When I looked at it, I assumed it was true."

Of course, it wasn't.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Staff reporter Brian Louis contributed to this report.

thestreet.com

=====

Once Bitten: Lessons From the Emulex Hoax
By Tim Arango
and Dagen McDowell
Staff Reporters
8/25/00 5:22 PM ET

Do you smell that? It's the smell of scores of investors burned by another online hoax involving phony company news.

The latest case: A news release on the Internet this morning claimed Emulex (EMLX:Nasdaq - news) would restate earnings and report a loss rather than a profit. The stock, in turn, plunged 57% before it was halted on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Emulex reopened after the hoax was detected and the stock regained most of its value, closing down 7 5/16, or 6.5%, at 105 3/4. But in the interim, many investors dumped the shares first and asked questions later. Among the many questions now being asked: How can investors protect themselves from making the same mistake twice?

Market-moving online hoaxes have happened before: In February, hackers broke into Aastrom Biosciences Web site and posted a phony notice about a merger with rival Geron. And in April 1999, a PairGain employee posted a bogus story online saying that the company had agreed to be acquired. In a market climate that sees an ever-increasing number of investors monitoring the latest news releases, it's likely to happen again.

Investment officials and cops on the beat at the top newswire outfits say there are lessons to be learned that can shield investors from the fire next time.

Live Wires

The Internet Wire, the six-year-old outfit that posted the bogus release, had this to say: "We are a delivery service of news announcements from corporations to the news media," said Jack Serpa, executive vice president of sales and strategic planning at Internet Wire. "We don't write or create the content of any of these news announcements that our clients send."

Business Wire and PRNewswire, the two best-known companies that disseminate news releases (who, in this case, didn't post the Emulex hoax), are the main line of defense against the spread of false news releases. The Big Two newswire companies offered some potential warnings signs for scanning news releases:

Beware of bad news on Friday.

Friday is typically a slow news day, and companies with bad news to share with the public will usually release it earlier in the week when it can be buried among other stories. "I'm always leery of Friday distribution of information," said David Savio, a spokesman at Business Wire. "There's less people to absorb it, and it's harder to hide."

Check contact information.

Many news releases offer several contact names, both within the company and its PR agency, said Kate Casey Foley, associate media relations specialist at PR firm Levick Strategic Communications. "A good release has several contacts," she said. In addition, it is important to check the email address provided in the contact name. An America Online or Hotmail address should raise suspicion.

Corroborate the information with other news sources and the company Web site.

"A lot of companies will post material information on their Web site as well," said Renu Aldrich, a spokeswoman at PRNewswire. "So if it's not there, that should be a red flag."

Once the news hits either Business Wire or PRNewswire, it should get the attention of investors. "It makes the first cut, that it's something I should pay attention to," said Ed Orgon, chief operating officer at Torrezano Group, a public relations firm. "Not act on it, but pay attention to it. Then you wait for legitimate news organizations to pick it up."

Check the title with the contents.

In the case of the phony Emulex release, the headline announced a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into accounting practices. However, the contents of the release did not mention it further.

Of course, there is one foolproof way to avoid getting hoodwinked. "If there's any doubt, call the company," Aldrich said.

Last One Out's a Rotten Egg

Another key lesson from the Emulex hoax: If you're a small investor who has a full-time job that doesn't involve watching CNBC all day, you are never going to be the first one out of the door.

By the time you get around to unloading a stock following a negative announcement, plenty of other investors have already sold. You're probably going to be at the back of the pack. And, investment professionals say, you could wind up selling at the bottom, which is the last thing you want to happen.

"Usually by the time you've heard the bad news, it's too late anyway," says Bryan Olson, director of Charles Schwab's Center for Investment Research.

Instead, you should take a moment to do your own investigation of the news. You want to find out what the big institutional investors, the people with greater resources and greater company access, are saying in the press. What are their thoughts and concerns? Are they staying or going?

When you first buy a stock, you should have already decided what is going to cause you to sell. Are you going to sell on the first sign of pessimistic news? Do you plan on owning the company for five months or five years?

Owning an Array of Stocks

Lastly, the Emulex incident also illustrates the importance of building a diversified portfolio that you'll have for a long time.

"If you have a well-diversified, long-term strategy in place, you won't be sitting on the edge of your seat at every announcement," says Schwab's Olson.

thestreet.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (670)8/26/2000 1:37:28 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 8/25/00 [EMLX] Reuters: Investors warned to do homework after Emulex hoax; Emulex hoax raises questions of Nasdaq rules; CBOE investigating Emulex options trade

Investors warned to do homework after Emulex hoax
By Emma-Kate Symons

NEW YORK, Aug 25 (Reuters) - The Emulex stock hoax was a wake-up call to giddy investors hooked on online information and electronic trading to do more research, think rationally and do their homework, market strategists, traders and company officials said on Friday.

Shares of Emulex Corp. (NASDAQ: EMLX) plummeted more than 50 percent after a phony press release said the company's chief executive had resigned and Emulex, a maker of network communication products, had been forced to restate earnings.

Some strategists called for extra safeguards on the Nasdaq and more careful vetting of Internet-sourced company data. But as Scott Bleier, chief investment strategist at Prime Charter said "if someone wants to break into your home they'll find a way, and if someone wants to commit fraud, they'll find a way."

The Emulex stock fraud recalled earlier celebrated examples of Internet trickery that burned investors and companies.

In 1999 a former employee at telecommunications equipment company PairGain Technologies Inc. pleaded guilty to posting a story on the Internet that said PairGain would be bought by an Israeli company in a billion-dollar deal.

The bogus story appeared on a Website made to look like one belonging to Bloomberg news, and it sent the stock soaring.

The Emulex hoax, however, was different, said Barry Hyman market strategist for Ehrenkrantz, King Nussbaum Inc.

"This is the first major story regarding manipulation, an Internet-based hoax," said Barry Hyman

"You have individuals that can get snookered by a Website," Hyman said.

"But this is something that was a false press release put together, there was unusual activity prior to the release and there was an intent to manipulate."

"I think it brings up to light that an investor shouldn't make decisions without doing research and trade or invest off headlines. You hopefully engage in more detailed research."

Hyman said he had "no emotions for people" who trade on limited information.

"Fortunately, these things are isolated and this is not the norm," Hyman said.

"But rational decision-making should be made more from a longer-term point of view. This is a wake-up call, maybe a gut check to say the Internet truly is a dangerous place and people can manipulate things very easily."

Bleier said the rapid investor reaction before the release was exposed as a fake highlighted "the risks of the new economy."

"It's part of the infancy of the new economy and the instantaneous ability to trade and get information - in return for that speed of dissemination comes the risk of false information," said Bleier.

"As time goes on and as more things happen there will be safeguards."

Emulex CEO and President Paul Folino cautioned investors to "do a little more homework" before they react.

siliconinvestor.com

=====

Emulex hoax raises questions of Nasdaq rules

NEW YORK, Aug 25 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq stock market's slow response to halt trading in network communication products maker Emulex Corp. (NASDAQ: EMLX) after a false news release sent the stock price down more than 50 percent on Friday calls into question Nasdaq's safeguards against such hoaxes.

Nasdaq's pride as a technologically advanced, "fluid market where stocks don't stop trading," may have contributed to its slow response, said Barry Hyman, market strategist for Ehrenkrantz, King Nussbaum.

The Emulex incident reveals flaws in its system.

"If this happened on the New York Stock Exchange there would still be an outcry," Hyman said. "The stock could very easily have stopped trading much quicker than on the Nasdaq. It seems to have created a problem with coordination of the electronic market."

A Nasdaq spokesman did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

The fake news release, put out on Web-based news dissemination service Internet Wire at 9:30 a.m. EDT (1330 GMT), said the company's chief executive had resigned and Emulex had been forced to restate 1998 and 1999 earnings, as well as revise the fourth quarter to a loss from a gain. The false release also said Emulex was under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The false news was picked up by Bloomberg and Dow Jones news wires, which said they received the news from Internet Wire.

Emulex shares plummeted and were down 48-1/16 at 65 when they were halted for trade at about 10:30 a.m. (1430 GMT).

NYSE rules call for a stock to be halted when there is an order imbalance, either on the buy side or the sell side. The Exchange would also halt the stock if it saw unexpected news released about one of its listed companies. Companies are required to report material news to the NYSE 10 minutes before releasing it to the market.

Emulex's shares resumed trading at almost 1:30 p.m. (1730 GMT) following a statement by the company saying the release was a fake. The share closed down 7-5/16 at 105-3/4.

siliconinvestor.com

=====

CBOE investigating Emulex options trade

CHICAGO, Aug 25 (Reuters) - The Chicago Board Options Exchange said on Friday it is reviewing Friday's "unusual" trading activity in options on shares of data network equipment maker Emulex Corp.

Shares of the California-based company plummeted over 50 percent, but then recouped the bulk of losses on Friday after the company said it had been the victim of a hoax press release that said Emulex was restating earnings and that its chief executive had resigned.

"The unusual trading has triggered an intense investigation," said a CBOE spokesman in response to an inquiry.

The CBOE generates the bulk of volume in the option, which also is listed at the American Stock Exchange, Pacific Exchange and Philadelphia Stock Exchange. Typically, the options exchange with the biggest marketshare spearheads any review of options trading.

"The PHLX, we are looking into this," said spokeswoman Heidi Van Vooren in response to an inquiry.

"We will be fully cooperative with whatever investigations are undertaken," said a PCX spokesman.

An AMEX spokesman said the exchange does not comment as a matter of policy on the existence of any investigation.

"There was a floor broker trying to buy puts," said one CBOE trader of options activity just before a fictitious news release knocked the stock more than 50 percent lower.

"Apparently, there was some unusual trading on our floor this morning, which threw up some red flags as it always does over here," added another CBOE source.

The fictitious news release and the company's subsequent denial sent Emulex options into fast-market conditions as implied volatility at first spiked higher then settled back down again as the stock regained most losses.

siliconinvestor.com