SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Emulex, What Prospects? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter V who wrote (597)8/26/2000 6:09:25 PM
From: Eddy Blinker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 788
 
Good attempt but far from being good enough

1_http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=14274746

2_http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=14275074

<< which is that the shorts are the cause of all the wrongdoing in the market. In fact, that is YOUR view, isn't it Eddy?>>>

My views that organized short selling is sickening to the bone stand. That organized short selling was at the root of the EMLX scandal I never said that.There could be other good reasons.

Your display of the two links about the 117 Dollar question is fine as a reply, but does not remove my doubts.Why Peter did you not link directly to this post.After all this is one of the most credible threads on SI. Besides the poster JAZZ poses a question behind 117.But you stated on the EMLX thread that you heard the next resistance levelis going to be 117.

I suggest why you did not link directly.Because if you would have, the person following the link may have discovered that there are actually people shortening EMLX successfully way below 100 for technical reasons as it was pointed out to you.

siliconinvestor.com

Consequently it is YOU who is not playing with the full deck as it was in your interest to get as many on board of EMLX as possible.Addressing people outside SI the lurkers so to speak.If you are a paid pumper that is.

Regards,

ED
PS.So please back to Dear Eddy and not He Blinker.Besides keep the swearing for yourself.



To: Peter V who wrote (597)8/26/2000 7:15:59 PM
From: Mike E.  Respond to of 788
 
Message 14276101

Message 14274178