Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chic_hearne who wrote (108490)	8/26/2000 5:37:44 PM
From: semiconeng	Respond to of 186894

Huh? You're saying Intel is not planing to go to .13um on Al at all? Nope, Nada, 0.13u Al(Not). The point I was making is that it took IBM and AMD forever to Cu working. Regardless if this is a different process, I don't think it will run smooth at first, at least not in 2001. No process runs "smoothly" at first, Copper, Aluminum, whatever. Duh? That's why I said from combined fabs, I was assuming one on Cu and one on Al, but you are telling me that Intel is only going to .13um on Cu. Mr. Barrett's insight should obviously by taken as written in stone given Intel's performance this year. chic Regardless of weather his recent business decisions were smart or not, it doesn't change what he sees at the development site. SemiconEng