To: pezz who wrote (84 ) 8/27/2000 9:40:00 PM From: Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042 Hey Pezz... How's 5.8 million scorched acres over the course of two months rate for "scale and speed" with regard to destruction of habitat. Yes some lands are lost through natural disasters but it's the scale and speed that counts. news.excite.com U.S. wildfires converge in "Perfect Storm" Updated 12:58 PM ET August 27, 2000 BOISE, Idaho (Reuters) - Uncontrolled blazes roaring across the U.S. West converged to form even larger fires Sunday, causing what one senior U.S. official called "a perfect storm" of tinderbox conditions, high winds, and forests thick with fuel. "It is tragic what's happened out there," Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman told Fox News Sunday as fire officials reported a total of more than 1.6 million acres ablaze in 13 western states . Nightmare weather conditions have combined to bring about a worst-case scenario for U.S. firefighters, much as converging hurricanes made for disaster in the recent book and movie "The Perfect Storm", Glickman said. "We have the hottest driest weather in perhaps 50 years, we have thousands of lightning strikes an hour, we have 300 new fires every day in the West, largely because of lightning strikes," he said. In Montana, one of the worst hit states, officials said two major fires burning near the Bitterroot National Forest had combined to form one monster 255,000 blaze. "That's a very large fire now that they have joined, and obviously the containment efforts between the two fires weren't successful," said Marine Corps Major Curtis Hill, a spokesman for the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise. "The fires have burned into one big, major area now. But the good side is that there are two teams working the same fire at this point," Hill said, adding that other, smaller blazes were also likely to join together. Other major fires were reported burning in Idaho, Washington, and South Dakota, while gusty winds and hot, dry weather remained in the forecast for much of the U.S. West through early this week. With some 25,000 people involved in the firefighting effort and a total of more than 5.8 million acres scorched to date, state and federal officials were taking a new look at the possible policy implications of this year's inferno. Glickman said that the traditional U.S. approach to forest fires may simply have run its course. "The convergence of that hot, dry weather...coupled with a policy of Congress and the administration for nearly 100 years of suppressing virtually every forest fire has created an environment where the fuels that are available for burning are greater than they might have been 500 to 600 years ago," he said, adding that President Clinton had asked him and Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt to develop a new firefighting strategy. Montana Gov. Marc Racicot, who has already closed a total of 30 of the state's 56 counties to anyone without a special use permit, said his state was now paying the price for years of neglect by state and federal officials. "The fact is everybody was warned of this...we have not attached the right priority to these issues," the governor told Fox News Sunday. "We're beyond $100 million in fire fighting expenses, and that's just suppression costs. We have no idea yet what's going to happen to the people of Montana in terms of economic losses." ^ REUTERS@"" ******* When is the last time that mankind destroyed wildlife habitat at such a rate? Now the question is whether we, as human beings, have any right to interfere with nature's fiery rampage of destruction. Should we just let it burn, or should we prevent nature from destroying itself? Or should we let loggers go in and selectively cut overgrown stands of trees, paying the gov't for the priviledge to boot? What's your stand on the issue?