Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (86610)	8/28/2000 12:25:58 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

On one end of the spectrum is simple plagiarism, on the other end complete originality, as when Plato articulates the image of the Cave, which was very original. Between those two polls there are varying degrees of sameness and difference attributed to artistic products. But for a work to be admired, there must have a "non- generic" quality to it, a certain freshness of treatment and uniqueness of identity, at least until others copy it. Thales was, as far as anyone knows, the first to claim that all things are water. Kant was, as far as anyone knows, the first to come up with the idea of the synthetic unity of apperception. Oil painting was invented in the 15th century, and the radio was invented in the 20th. The idea of romantic love associated with chivalry seems to have been conceived in the Middle Ages, and the idea of the Fatherhood of God seems to have arisen in Judaism. There are plenty of original ideas, and it is not too much to ask that an artist or composer or writer at least add elements that justify the distinct existence of his or her work.......