Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (51541)	8/28/2000 1:31:19 PM
From: chic_hearne	Respond to of 93625

Re: And please do not quote Tom's Hardware Why? Because Tom is right and the truth hurts?

To: mishedlo who wrote (51541)	8/28/2000 1:39:49 PM
From: NightOwl	Respond to of 93625

Thanks much, I see your point. When I read the article it occurred to me that the writer may have been firing a shot at the recent discussions about Samsung's revisions to the DRDRAM core. I.e., reducing the banks of the core was problematic for low latency applications. ...In addition to suggesting that FCRAM was a good solution for such applications. But of course those aren't the ONLY solutions, either for the DRDRAM core or low Latency/short data burst applications. 0\|0

To: mishedlo who wrote (51541)	8/28/2000 1:52:52 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

mishedlo, Here are a few additional "angles" you might want to consider if you are really interested in "latency" related issues. electronicproducts.com 0\|0