Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dealer who wrote (30876)	8/28/2000 10:08:51 PM
From: nolimitz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Thanks Just thought it was time somebody called bullshit on Rambus and didn't just roll over and play dead. Yes I have a vested interest to the tune of 14 yrs. nolimitz

To: Dealer who wrote (30876)	8/28/2000 10:39:50 PM
From: Dealer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

To: Ian Stromberg who started this subject From: richard surckla Monday, Aug 28, 2000 10:20 PM ET Reply # of 51597 Anyone... What part of the Federal Antitrust Laws were broken by Rambus? From what I know about law and from what I know about how Rambus makes money, I say no laws have been broken. But I'm not an attorney. I'm sure we have a few attorneys that could shed some light on this even if it's not there specialty. How does a company like Rambus that manufactures no products fall into the antitrust category? Can there be antitrust when the only thing you are protection is IP through patents? If Antitrust laws were not broken then why would Micron file such a suit? For the same reason that many suits are filed... intimidation. Look for a counter suit and a very firm response from Rambus.