Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (108825)	8/29/2000 1:30:09 AM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: The difference between Barrett and Sanders is that Sanders founded AMD. For that reason it would see more likely that Barrett would be removed because of problems rather than Sanders. Ted, An interesting statement. I want to see Sanders gone. It will be good for AMD stock. We have to agree, wall street has become very short sighted. As I've heard many longs say, Rambus and the IA64 architecture were Groves decisions. Barrett has to take the blame, I guess. Dresden and non-support of Rambus were Sanders' decision. This is great, but I think AMD will get more respect when Ruiz takes over. Wall street is not capable of looking more than a few months back to see who f*cked over the company and who didn't. chic PS- I'm not saying Sanders has been good for AMD, more that Barret inherited the problems, he did not create them.