Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VAUGHN who wrote (6193)	8/29/2000 10:38:22 AM
From: teevee	Respond to of 7235

Vaughn, why would you put a geophone effectively parallel to the sill/dipping dike rather than simply employ surface O&G seismic and get a picture perpendicular or cross section to the deposit? I am not a geophysicist, but I think it goes something like this: in a 3-D survey, a number of parallel lines of geophones are set out on surface. Second, assuming there is a velocity diference between the sound waves in granite versus kimberlite, having a geophone down a drill hole beside the kimberlite being mapped, helps pick the correct time interval to map when interpreting the data. Low angle faults could also give a velocity contrast, so knowing which velocity/time horizon is of interest is a big help. regards, teevee