Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cardcounter who wrote (51652)	8/29/2000 8:28:57 AM
From: capt rocky 1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

you think intc knew something last month when they dumped their mu shares? this is crunch time for mu. i bet rmbs asks for an injunction against mu armed with toshiba, hitachi, and oki wins . mu must prove that they alone have the right not to pay royalities. this is a last ditch effort by mu and surely a nogociating tactic. great time to pick up the bus. rocky

To: cardcounter who wrote (51652)	8/29/2000 8:46:48 AM
From: sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

"The shorts have been right since the 150's..." Hold on there, partner. I understand your bitterness (been in a similar situation myself many times), but let's think about this for a moment. Significance imho: Finally, someone for the opposition (MU) steps up to the plate. Probably cause it anticipated a lawsuit against it -- but at least it took the offensive. For a change. IMO, this battle will be won or lost in the courtroom (until RDRAM proves itself as a standard--which it hasn't yet done imo). Taking the offensive against RMBS is certainly not a bad tactical choice for MU. May help MU focus their claim such that they can present something that has a shot of convincing a trier of fact. But ultimately, nothing really has changed...except MU is now a party. Maybe they have a claim. Maybe not. Time will tell. Getting interesting, though. Isn't it?