SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dealer who wrote (30962)8/29/2000 5:03:59 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
For the QCOM longs.....

From the rocket thread......
Very Respected TA guy--
THEWEALTHYANALYST
(M/San Diego, CA) 8/29/00 4:57 pm

Founder of ClearStation...

'kensey' has recommended QCOM (Long) at Aug 29 2000 3:37PM

Qualcomm Inc ( NASDAQ : QCOM )
Telecomm Equipment : 1 new highs in group of 112

Symbol Last Time Change High Low Volume
----- ---- ---- ----- ---- --- -----
QCOM 60.88 3:21PM 1.50 61.00 58.63 6,126,300

Community Take
--------------
718 Long / 82 Short

'kensey' said:
perhaps QCOM is starting to turn the corner.

comfortable adding at 60 and waiting it out. perspective is long term buy / hold as the stock has been treading horizontal for some months.

clearstation.com



To: Dealer who wrote (30962)8/29/2000 5:07:33 PM
From: Dutch  Respond to of 35685
 
Gag or no gag, legitimate question, hope he will help us out.
tia. Dutch

" You cannot be so poor that you cannot help somebody. Good nature is the cheapest commodity in the world; and love is the only thing that pays ten percent, to borrower and lender both" Voltaire



To: Dealer who wrote (30962)8/29/2000 5:39:37 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
dealie-

Dutch! Voltaire has a gag in his mouth and has gone on hiatus until RMBS get to 200 or January......unless I can talk him into returning.....and I do not have a lot of influence with him. dealie

does this mean we can say "fock" till he comes back?

fock, fock, fock. i focking wish focking volt-man would focking come focking back. fock.

-sailormouth



To: Dealer who wrote (30962)8/29/2000 5:40:41 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Respond to of 35685
 
Hey Dealer + Volt et al ... LOL!

Hell's bells (Rose ... isn't that from north of U.S. border? My Dad said that all his life ... Michigander ... also said "eh?" which makes me think the expression 'hell's bells' also has Northern origins ... <g>)

Voltaire: no one here makes any investing decisions 'because you said so.' <g> (I hope that's not a blow to your ego <g> ... knowing it is not).

Are you afraid that you've 'gone out on an irretrievable limb'?

Would be incredibly SILLY to think such a thing. IMO.

I'm getting the idea this is some sort of 'self-imposed' absence ... or 'abstinence' <g> ... the latter would be a lot more fun for you, again, IMO.

Although many of us frequently and consistently appear to be, we're not idiots looking for 'blind divine <g> guidance.' Even your 'angels' can err occasionally.

If we're really idiots, we're idiots ALL BY OURSELVES, and no amount of 'outside interference' can alter that basic 'condition.' <g>

I don't think in the RMBS situation that this is the case.

Don't beat yourself up, dude.

'bonnuss gump'
###



To: Dealer who wrote (30962)8/29/2000 5:54:24 PM
From: Dutch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
Dealer,
Not worried about Rambus, bought last year at $86, followed her up and down $129 to $60 and then to $80 today post split. Only reason I asked was from a legal perspective, V is an attorney and much more versed in these areas. RMBS can move 40% in a week and I've gotten over the swings. He commented that the suit was baseless over anti-trust issues revolving around patents. Just looking for a little clarification as to my question.
Dutch