SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paul who wrote (34888)8/29/2000 8:46:11 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
paul - I agree that in today's world, single box performance is important for many users, especially those looking for headroom on an older, non-partitionable app.

But the rest of your argument is way off base. None of the other benchmark systems have any redundancy either. On any of the single system configurations, if you lose a disk - crash the database. Lose a processor - maybe crash the database. In that sense, the partitioned systems, as configured for TPC, actually have better fault tolerance than the single systems. But none of them are fault tolerant - that costs more, and is not a part of the benchmark for any class of system.



To: paul who wrote (34888)8/29/2000 11:51:59 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Respond to of 64865
 
I think the TPC-C website characterizes them as clustered -- I just picked up their terminology. I'll let you and rudedog work through the finer points of that distinction.