Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (55396)	8/29/2000 10:23:06 PM
From: Gauguin	Respond to of 71178

We're not sorry. And it was a swell post jbe blasted there. eom

To: Ish who wrote (55396)	8/29/2000 10:35:09 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

Gee, Ish. I wasn't trying to prove you wrong. I was only having some silly fun chasing down some clues. The only people I would consider wrong would be the equally silly "experts" who opine on the plausibility of one or more theory, without getting off their lazy duffs to check anything out. Wouldn't you think at least one of them would investigate the MacKay reference? As for me, I don't really care who the real whatever was. <sulk> Joan

To: Ish who wrote (55396)	8/29/2000 10:50:48 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 71178

Sorry to bring it up. Don't be sorry. Gave a nice discursion, and saved Joan from having to do real work when she felt lousy! <bg>