Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gnuman who wrote (51953)	8/30/2000 8:25:22 AM
From: Estephen	Respond to of 93625

liberate us Stevie !!! liberate us from evil rambus !!! Bert your too much aaahahahah.. "Micron filed suit to prevent Rambus from successfully taking down every other DRAM manufacturer," McComas said. "The whole thing needed to be accelerated, so that everyone who is threatened by Rambus is liberated." yahoo.cnet.com

To: gnuman who wrote (51953)	8/30/2000 8:27:19 AM
From: capt rocky 1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

these lawsuits may be the outcome of the jedec meeting that intc walked away from last month. if so ,and rmbs can prove it, it could be construed as a conspirecy against rmbs. it looks like a concentrated effort to cause rmbs harm by using the us justice system to punish rmbs. if you think the judges won't see this you are wrong. if intc testifies to that, the dramuri are opening a new bag of worms and triple damages and punitive damages could be awarded. jmo.rocky

To: gnuman who wrote (51953)	8/30/2000 8:27:26 AM
From: Estephen	Respond to of 93625

I find your jedec rules oppressive, who can possible liberate us ?? rambus please liberate the world from this evil colusion !!!

To: gnuman who wrote (51953)	8/30/2000 8:38:38 AM
From: John Walliker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Gene, What point is there in quoting from a manual written in February 1999? Do you have a link to the JEDEC manual that was current when Rambus attended meetings? Did one even exist? John

To: gnuman who wrote (51953)	8/30/2000 10:19:35 AM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

JEDEC was DEFUNCT before 1997? (Thanks to h0db from Yahoo...) by: h0db (40/M/Tysons Corner, VA) 8/30/00 9:59 am Msg: 154203 of 154214 WTF? jedec.org 1977- The JEDEC Tube Council disbanded and formed the Tube Electron Panel Advisory Council (TEPAC). With the cessation of the Tube Council, only one JEDEC Council remained. It was nonetheless still Joint, in that it was sponsored by both EIA and NEMA; but the acronym JEDEC was now redefined as Joint Electron Device Engineering Council ("Councils" having been changed to to the singular form.). When NEMA subsequently withdrew its financial support from JEDEC Council, JEDEC became solely sponsored by EIA. The New Era 1997/98- With the rapid growth of JEDEC, a major step was taken to become the forerunners in electronic distribution, in doing so a JEDEC website was created on the Internet at www.jedec.org....[SNIP] Folks, that's a 10-YEAR GAP that covers the crucial period in the early 1990s when Rambus filed patents and alledgedly attended "inform" meetings on an SDRAM standard (which failed to ever proglumate a standard). As a standards-setting body, has JEDEC ever functioned as a recognized entity that actually produced standards? Did it even exist as a legal or industry-recognized entity when these meetings supposedly took place? Gene, I thought you left us? Good to see you back!