Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (108985)	8/30/2000 1:52:55 PM
From: JDN	Respond to of 186894

Dear Tenchusatsu: When things were going well I thought you were in charge?? (gg) JDN

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (108985)	8/30/2000 1:53:40 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

Tn, >What does this say about Intel? Well, why ask me? I'm just a lowly peon. :-\ No you aren't! But, whatever, stick around, y'hear? Tony

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (108985)	8/30/2000 2:18:41 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten, What do you think about these benchmarks? 2cpu.com If they are correct, Intel is going to be having some tough times competing against AMD. Scumbria

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (108985)	8/30/2000 2:32:58 PM
From: maui_dude	Respond to of 186894

Tenchusatsu, Re : "I feel better with just one A than with with five B's and no A's" Appreciate your thought. However, Intels stretegy seems to be getting away from just excelling in one area. Focus on getting 100% market of microprocessor seem to be less important than doing well in several areas. There's risk of excelling in just one area is that, if the market shift under you, then you are very vulnerable to a fall. As a Intel shareholder, I would rather see a slightly lower growth at a higher confidence level and for a longer duration. In my mind, as long as Intel keep getting into SUNs market and grows the overall pie and gets into other markets is far more important. Maui