SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/30/2000 3:30:32 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116762
 
<<Btw, making any agency accountable to populist voter pressures is the quickest way to create a tyranny of special interest politics.>>

& doing it to a lesser extent is to create the tyranny of "all powers in the same hands" James Madison wrote so well against in Federalist Paper #47.

While I don't agree with "pure democracies" couldn't the current status of the IMF be best described by the situation our founding fathers spoke & fought against & died to prevent, "Taxation without representation"?



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/31/2000 7:41:59 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116762
 
The Last Straw in Russia
Joe Uliana
September 2, 1999

On March 18th, then Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin informed Congress that much of a $4.8 billion loan package extended last year by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to help prop up the Russian economy “may have been siphoned off improperly.”
While Rubin tried to parse his words afterward, his testimony should have been big news. It confirmed the worst suspicions of many that the IMF and United States policy in Russia was doing nothing to help the Russian economy, but was just lining the pocket of the oligarchs.

It also should have been a wake-up call to stop the extension of an additional $4.5 billion in loans requested by Russia to help make their scheduled debt payment to the IMF in 1999 - but that didn’t happen. A few weeks ago, the IMF approved the first installment of $4.5 billion loan package that had been negotiated as a thank-you gift for Russia’s helpful behavior in NATO’s war in Kosovo. Now a firestorm is rightly brewing.

Law enforcement sources are reporting that much of the IMF’s loan money over the past seven years has been stolen and laundered out of the country by the oligarchs who surround President Boris Yeltsin. The Bank of New York, one of the countries oldest banks, is being investigated for its role in helping to launder some of the money. It is estimated that almost $10 billion in foreign aid has been stolen and taken out of the country.

A fleecing of this magnitude has rarely been seen in history of civilization. Not since Alexander the Great looted Darius’s palace at Persepolis of the wealth of the Persian Empire has so much be taken from a country against its will. (cont)
newsmax.com



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/31/2000 7:43:35 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116762
 
IMF Chief to Favor New Loan for Russia
Washington Post
July 14, 1999

Michel Camdessus, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, plans to recommend an additional $4.5 billion in loans to Russia to keep it from defaulting on earlier outstanding IMF loans, officials said today after the Russian government approved new economic policies.
If the IMF board agrees, as is likely when the proposal is made in two weeks, Russia will be able to borrow $1.9 billion this year and the remainder the following year, Russian officials said. The new loans would keep Russia from failing to make scheduled payments on its old IMF loans.

Camdessus said last month that he was encouraged by figures showing Russia's industrial production and tax revenue are up while inflation is losing steam.


newsmax.com



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/31/2000 8:05:34 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116762
 
note: The Treasury not my elected representatives in Congress
Bereuter Calls IMF Recommendations Dramatic, Helpful
International Relations Committee Vice Chairman Criticizes Treasury Department's Reluctance to Support Reform

WASHINGTON, Mar. 10— Congressman Doug Bereuter (Ne-R), Vice Chairman of the House Committee on International Relations and a senior member of the House Banking Committee, today called on the congressional banking committees to use their influence to push for reforms of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Bereuter criticized the U.S. Treasury Department's continuing reluctance to press for IMF reform.

Reacting to a report released by the International Financial Institution Advisory Commission, Bereuter said, "Congress has lost confidence in the IMF. The IMF and its defenders in the Treasury Department have been unwilling to admit its errors and recent misjudgments.

"At the same time, if we didn't have the IMF or an institution like it, we would have to create one. The first step in the process of reform is to admit the recent failures of the IMF. That is something that the Administration has been unwilling to do, because in reality it is the U.S. Treasury that dictates important IMF policy. This resistance to reform is unfortunate, for we may always have a European in charge of the IMF, but in fact the U.S. Treasury Department under any Administration calls the shots on crucial policy matters. Nothing of substance happens at the IMF unless Treasury approves."
(cont)
gop.gov



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/31/2000 8:08:36 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116762
 
FROM THE OFFICE OF
Representative Richard K. Armey
Texas, 26th District
Communication Center | Home Page


NEWS RELEASE


Reforming International Financial Institutions
WASHINGTON, Mar. 8—
House Majority Leader Dick Armey made the following comments at a press conference today in which the final report of the International Financial Institution Advisory Commission was presented to congressional leaders:

I want to extend my very deep appreciation to Chairman Allan
Meltzer, Jeffrey Sachs and the other members of the commission. It's not easy to get a group of economists to agree on anything, much less major reform of our international financial institutions. But they have done it.

To their credit, they have achieved a broad consensus that will serve to guide us as we consider these matters this year.

This report will help reverse years of IMF mission creep. Ever since the IMF's original purpose vanished along with the old Bretton Woods system, the IMF, like any bureaucracy, has been casting about for a new role. Naturally, it found several-and not all of them were good.

But if we implement the commission's recommendations, we will turn the IMF around. No longer will the IMF offer overly ambitious schemes to redesign entire economies. No longer will it impose Herbert Hoover-style austerity plans on countries in trouble. And no longer will the IMF bail out the bankrupt on the backs of the poor.

Instead, the IMF will serve a much more restrained but effective role as what economists call a quasi-lender of last resort. It will focus on offering short-term assistance to countries to ease financial panics and crises. It will be there to stop trouble, not make trouble.

The commission has also highlighted a scandalous level of
mismanagement at the World Bank. For years, the Bank has been doling out money for poverty reduction without verifying that the money actually reduced poverty. The world's poor-not to mention the world's taxpayers-deserve better than that. The commission has a plan to clean up the Bank, and all who care about alleviating world poverty need to have a good look at it.

I believe this report will form the bipartisan basis for legislative action this year. This leadership cares deeply about preserving the health of the international economy. Like expanded trade with China -- which we strongly favor -- and like free trade generally, IMF reform will make the world economy stronger and help ensure that America's prosperity endures. As we expand trade and the relations between nations, it is more important than ever that the IMF serve a constructive role, rather than the destabilizing one it often has in the past.

gop.gov



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/31/2000 8:12:56 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116762
 
"The Committee will review issues such as the status of IMF changes and compliance by IMF borrowers with new conditions of financial system transparency and other reforms."

The Banking Committee's Agenda for 2000
WASHINGTON, Feb. 9— Financial Over-the-Counter Derivatives:
The Committee will review and consider legislative recommendations made by the President's Working Group on Financial Markets on the Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets, including those recommendations concerning the netting of derivatives contracts as contained in H.R. 1161 and the House passed bankruptcy bill. While some of the working group's recommendations may amend the Commodities Exchange Act, which is under the primary jurisdiction of the Agriculture Committee, other elements of the recommendations affect matters under the jurisdiction of the Banking Committee. The Committee, since the publication in the 103rd Congress of the then minority's 902-page report on Safety and Soundness Issues related to Bank Derivatives Activities, has had an interest in these transactions in which the vast majority of participants are commercial banks.

Money Laundering:
Money laundering has become a trauma in international finance and carries enormous implications not only for the illegal drug trade, but for financial activities in countries, like Russia, where questions have arisen about the integrity of governmental and financial institutions. The Committee is particularly interested in elevating the importance attached to governmental corruption and the use of so-called offshore secrecy havens.

Review of Recent Bank Failures and FDIC Special Examination Authority:
The Committee will review the underlying factors of recent bank failures, and examine regulatory initiatives to address the risks that have contributed to several of these failures. In particular, bank lending to subprime borrowers, the securitization and transfer of assets, and the valuation of retained interests will be reviewed. The Committee will also assess the independence of the FDIC relating to the exercise of the FDIC's special examination authority, and whether adequate coordination exists between various federal and state agencies responsible for bank regulation.

Oversight of Holocaust Assets Restitution Issues:
Over the past four years, the Committee has held a series of hearings about restitution of property stolen or extorted from Holocaust victims during the Nazi era. The Committee has heard from more than 100 witnesses from the U.S. and a dozen foreign countries on subjects ranging from dormant accounts in Swiss banks to insurance company accountability to the theft of art from Holocaust victims to questions of moral responsibility for the Holocaust itself. In addition, the Committee initiated legislation creating a U.S. commission to study the disposition of Holocaust victims' assets in the U.S. During this session, the Committee will hold further hearings on these issues to review proposed settlements with Swiss Banks and the German government and industry for forced and slave laborers. The Committee will also examine indemnification of survivors or their heirs for wartime insurance policies and stolen or extorted art works.

Financial Services Modernization Act:
The Committee and Subcommittees will formally and informally review the implementation of aspects of the financial services modernization act approved last year.

World Bank AIDS Prevention Trust Fund Act (H.R. 3519):
In Africa, a human tragedy is unfolding on a scale terrifyingly reminiscent of the plagues that swept through Europe during the Middle Ages. Although Sub-Saharan Africa has only 10% of the world's population, it has 70% of all those who have contracted HIV/AIDS. To address the urgency of this public health and economic development crisis, H.R. 3519 directs the U.S. government to seek the establishment of a special AIDS trust fund at the World Bank to support AIDS education, prevention, treatment, and vaccine development in the world's poorest countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia where the epicenter of this disease is fast moving. It authorizes U.S. contributions of $100 million a year for five years in hopes of leveraging this support to obtain funds from other governments as well as private sector companies toward a goal of $1 billion a year. Hearings on the bill are tentatively scheduled for early March.

Debt Relief for the World's Poorest Countries:
Last year, the Committee reported out H.R. 1095 authorizing bilateral and international organization debt relief for up to 45 of the poorest countries of the world. This plan was 70 percent funded in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill. This year, working with faith-based organizations, the Administration and the Senate, the Committee will assess approaches to comprehensive funding for this initiative.

Creating Homeownership and Economic Renewal Opportunities (H.R. 1776): Housing Subcommittee and Committee markup is expected for H.R. 1776, the "American Homeownership and Economic Opportunity Act," in early 2000. Homeownership is a building block for family security and stability as well as for healthy, prosperous communities. All families deserve the opportunity to achieve the American dream of owning a home. To advance this goal, H.R. 1776 is designed to help communities reclaim distressed neighborhoods and rebuild America's inner cities by reducing barriers to affordable housing, expanding creative homeownership tools for states and local non-profits, giving localities more flexibility to create homeownership opportunities for municipal employees, providing deep discounts on the sale of HUD-held homes to teachers, and improving accountability and strengthening consumer safeguards regarding manufactured housing.

Ending the Cycle of Homelessness (H.R. 1073):
The Committee expects to take to the Floor in early 2000, H.R. 1073, the "Homeless Housing Programs Consolidation and Flexibility Act." H.R. 1073, which is based on legislation that passed the House by a vote of 386 to 23 in the 105th Congress, passed the Committee in April 1999 by voice vote. Although the federal government has more than doubled spending on homelessness programs in the 1990s, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children remain homeless. Families with children comprise more than a third of the homeless population, at least 25% of homeless men are veterans, and nearly 75% of the homeless population struggles with additional burdens of mental illness, substance abuse or chronic illness. H.R. 1073 would address these issues by consolidating seven disparate federal homeless programs and requiring coordination among affected federal agencies, thereby eliminating wasteful duplication and directing resources where most needed. The bill focuses on prevention and permanent housing solutions.

Protecting Homeowners from Natural Disasters (H.R. 21):
H.R. 21, the "Homeowners' Insurance Availability Act," passed the Committee in November 1999 by a vote of 34 to 18. The Committee expects to take the bill to the Floor during this session. The Federal government has spent more than $80 billion since 1983 on natural disaster assistance. In certain earthquake-and-hurricane-prone areas, families are unable to obtain affordable homeowners' insurance. Forecasters are warning that both the East and Gulf Coasts are entering a prolonged siege of more frequent and more destructive hurricanes that may last for decades. To address these issues, H.R. 21 provides a targeted, voluntary Federal reinsurance backstop to state and private sector efforts to encourage homeowners' insurance availability in the private sector. While creating an explicit federal liability, the bill is designed to develop private sector insurance contributions which reduce the implicit federal liability for disasters which exist in current programmatic approaches.

Building on Protections for Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Living in Affordable Housing (H.R. 202):
H.R. 202, "Preserving Affordable Housing for Seniors and Vulnerable Families into the 21st Century" passed the House in September 1999 by a vote of 405 to 5. While some provisions of the legislation were enacted into law through the Appropriations process, much remains to conference with the Senate. H.R. 202 provides common sense reforms and flexibility to HUD's senior and disabled housing programs administered by non-profits. The bill allows for modernization of project financing, streamlined refinancing, the creation of mixed-income senior and disabled housing environments, the conversion of senior housing projects to assisted living facilities for "aging in place, " and greater flexibility for provision of supportive services to vulnerable families.

Depository Institution Regulatory Streamlining Act (H.R. 1585):
Led by the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions, the Committee will consider legislation to provide for regulatory relief for financial services institutions, including provisions to allow banks to pay interest on business checking accounts and receive interest on sterile reserves held at the Federal Reserve.

Merger of Bank and Savings Association Insurance Funds:
The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions will hold a hearing on the proposal to merge the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund and related issues.

Rural Television Loan Guarantees:
The Banking Committee will consider legislation providing for federal loan guarantees to multi-channel video providers serving households in unserved and underserved rural communities.

Fair Credit Reporting Act and Employment Investigations:
The Committee will review how the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) affects employer investigations of on-the-job employee misconduct.

Hedge Fund Disclosure Bill (H.R. 2924):
The Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities and Government-Sponsored Enterprises will take up legislation to require large hedge funds to report appropriate financial information to regulators and the public.

GSE Oversight:
The Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities and Government-Sponsored Enterprises will hold hearings on the effectiveness with which the Federal Housing Finance Board and the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight regulate the Federal Home Loan Bank System, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and on possible legislation creating a single oversight agency for the three housing GSEs.

Oversight of International Financial System Reforms:
The 1998 International Monetary Fund quota increase legislation included language which originated in the Banking Committee requiring the Treasury Department to submit a report on International Financial Institutions reforms. The Committee will review issues such as the status of IMF changes and compliance by IMF borrowers with new conditions of financial system transparency and other reforms.

Community Development Financial Institution Program:
The Committee expects to take to the floor H.R. 629, legislation the Committee approved last year to reform and reauthorize the CDFI program for four years at $95 million for fiscal year 2000 with $5 million increments thereafter. The bill requires installation of an objective scoring system and multi-person panels to review and evaluate all funding applications.

Banking and Housing Agency Accountability Preservation Act (H.R. 3046):
The Committee will work with the Senate on this bill which the House approved last fall. Among the reports slated for continuation are the semi-annual Humphrey-Hawkins testimony of the Federal Reserve Board on the state of the nation's economy and the Fed's annual survey of bank fees and services. The bill also provides for continuation of several reports by Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Treasury, the Ex-Im Bank and the Federal Housing Finance Board in order to enhance Congressional oversight of activities of these agencies.
gop.gov



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (57717)8/31/2000 9:17:13 AM
From: Rarebird  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116762
 
*OT* Richard, don't you think it is a little unfair to bombard a person with 8 posts prior to the Market open? The person may be involved in some important research and need to make some important decisions as to trading strategies for the session.

Why don't you try one or two posts first and then wait for a response? Then you can come back with another post or two.

PS I know I couldn't digest all these posts and respond properly right before the Market open.