SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sam who wrote (52016)8/30/2000 5:59:43 PM
From: sam  Respond to of 93625
 
Intel Designs Processor For Value
PC Market
(08/30/00, 4:40 p.m. ET) By Will Wade, EE Times

Intel Corp. is focusing its engineering skills on a highly
integrated device that incorporates both a graphics
engine and a Rambus memory controller into a single
processor chip aimed at the low-cost PC segment.

The device, known as the Timna, is expected to launch
early next year. The company gave a sneak peek of the
design at the recent Intel Developer Forum trade show.

"We are designing the Timna for the low-cost, value PC
market," said Ilan Spillinger, a principal engineer at Intel
and head of the Israel-based design team working on the
chip.

Implemented at the 0.18-micron production level, the
design is essentially recycling many of the elements
already in use today. It is based on the same processor
core as the Katmai-class MPUs that began shipping in
1999 as the first generation of the Pentium III. It also
features the same graphics engine currently used in
Intel's integrated 810 chipset, and the same 128-Kbyte
Level 2 cache used in the current generation of Celeron
chips, Intel's primary entry in the low-cost PC segment
today.

Although the Timna will feature a memory controller to
use Rambus (stock: RMBS) DRAM technology, the
company also plans to ship an external device alongside
the Timna that translates RDRAM signals into a format
that will allow the processor to be used in systems with
standard SDRAM. At first blush, this strategy might
seem like another sign that Intel is backing away from
steadfast support of RDRAM. But Dean McCarron,
principal analyst for Mercury Research, Scottsdale, Ariz.,
said that "incredible as it may seem," this has always
been the plan.

"I first saw the specs for this part three years ago, and
even then it had the RDRAM controller and an external
SDRAM translator," McCarron said.

The keys to this contradiction are cost and bandwidth.
Spillinger said the main reason for the integrated
RDRAM controller is not to use Rambus chips, but to
allow the most data to get shuttled on and off the
processor with the fewest pins. Timna is all about cost.
Using fewer pins allows for less expensive packaging,
which in turn cuts production costs and delivers lower
prices to the end user.

As McCarron explained, an RDRAM controller uses 16
pins running at 800 MHz, allowing a maximum bandwidth
of 1.28 Gbyte/s. Using an SDRAM controller would
have required four times as many pins and yielded only
half the bandwidth. "Using more pins has a direct
correlation to increased packaging costs," McCarron
said. "You just get a lot more bang for your pin with
Rambus."

At this point, nobody is under any illusion that the Timna
will end up in systems using Rambus memory chips. "The
market can't currently support that because of the
[RDRAM's] price premium," said Spillinger.

Intel, Santa Clara, Calif., already has one component
available to translate data from an RDRAM controller
into SDRAM signals, but that part was recently found to
have some design glitches and is being revamped. The
newer version is likely to be the one that is eventually
used with the Timna.

One point that McCarron questioned was the timing of
the launch. Intel expects Timna to debut in the first
quarter of next year at speeds north of 600 MHz. Putting
all the processor's component parts on a single die would
seem to make for a large die size, a fact almost certain to
lead to lower yields. And the value market Intel is aiming
it at means low prices and lowmargins.

Given these facts, McCarron wondered why Intel would
allocate wafers to the Timna when the same wafer could
generate much more revenue, and profit, with Pentium
III or Pentium 4 chips? He pointed out that in today's
market, customers are snapping up processors about as
fast as Intel and its competitors can turn them out.

Also, McCarron questioned how the Timna will compare
on the performance front. The Katmai core has proven
itself, but the graphics engine used in the 810 chipset was
considered second-rate when it launched 18 months ago,
and now will be even more lackluster compared with
some of the whizzy graphics cores that have since
appeared. And the effort to translate every memory
signal moving from the processor to the main system
memory -- the controller's job -- will certainly lead to a
performance hit, he said.

But luckily for Intel (stock: INTC) nobody is likely to
care. "The Timna is all about cost," said McCarron.
"Since when has anybody cared about performance at
this end of the market? And if Timna is successful, I
have no doubt that it will be upgraded quickly." techweb.com